“The primary reason for taking Crimea may have been ensuring access to the ocean,” Schue said, “but it also allowed them to regain control of the Loran transmission site there. This has assured them sovereign terrestrial PNT [positioning, navigation and timing] for the entire region, including the Black Sea.” https://www.gpsworld.com/russia-expected-to-ditch-glonass-for-loran-in-ukraine-invasion/
Azerbaijan seized upon Russia’s distraction with the Ukraine War to again attack Armenia last month. Azerbaijan is stronger and larger than its neighbor, and has more international allies. Armenia’s only useful friend is Russia. https://youtu.be/7NOMj7n6QAM
The U.S. military has a large number of old, mothballed cargo and support ships that can be activated on short notice to move troops and supplies anywhere in the world. It is called the “Ready Reserve Force.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ready_Reserve_Force_ships
Someday we will resurrect dinosaurs in some form, aliens disguised as humans could be among us, and humans might someday exist as brains floating in jars, able to indulge in any fantasy (such as triggering waking dreams). https://youtu.be/iuYACq8v0GQ
In the 1960s, GE made a four-legged “Walking Truck” that had legs instead of wheels, for the U.S. military. This video of it clumsily moving around shows why it never made it out of the prototype phase, and why legged vehicles of any type were never successful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grVxdNW34FQ
Computers are much better than human experts at matching humans with the right colleges, fields of study, and careers. Imagine this paired with the “hyper-personalized training” and “micro-credentials” paradigm: At age 18, a supercomputer would give you a short list of careers you would be suited for. You pick the one you like best, and go through a stripped-down training regimen that only includes things directly relevant to doing that job. You would enter the workforce much faster and would be more of an asset to the economy. Vastly less time and money would be wasted on useless degrees, dropped majors, and career mistakes. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-32416-001
“After building on years of work from MILA, DeepMind, ourselves, and others, our AIs are now expert-human-level in no-press Diplomacy and Hanabi! Unlike Go and Dota, Diplomacy/Hanabi involve *cooperation*, which breaks naive RL.” https://twitter.com/polynoamial/status/1580185706735218689
Computers can now simulate fluids with lifelike accuracy. This video contains amazing examples of such simulations. https://youtu.be/8NAi30ZBpJU
The direction of the economy is practically impossible to forecast, except to the grossest degree. On any given day, a well-credentialed person or team of people working for some impressive-sounding institution will publish a serious-looking paper, or give a very serious-sounding TV interview, where they say the economy is about to collapse. Consider this badly wrong example from a year ago:
Jupiter could destroy us or protect us. The planet’s atmosphere has a layer that is rich in deuterium, and detonating a nuclear weapon in that layer might be enough to ignite all of it, creating a huge explosion that would destroy the side of Earth (and any other planet) that was facing it at that moment. A country, group, or crazed rich person could, with future technology, hold the rest of the world hostage with the threat of sending a nuclear space missile to blow up Jupiter. Moreover, if there were a future war between humans living on different planets (like Earth and Mars), one side might decide to detonate Jupiter when its own planet was directly shielded from the explosion by the Sun while the enemy planet was exposed.
Aliens could also detonate Jupiter to exterminate humanity from afar. However, humans could also blow up Jupiter as a sort of “dead man’s switch” that was meant to exterminate any alien fleet or civilization that was conquering our Solar System. We would kill ourselves as well, but at least we’d have the satisfaction of taking them with us and leaving nothing of value behind. Our mere threat of doing this might be enough to convince hostile aliens to leave the Solar System.
In the far future, when we start “mining” Jupiter, we’ll probably make it a priority to slowly siphon off the deuterium in its atmosphere, both to prevent this cataclysm and to fuel spacecraft.
One solution to the Fermi Paradox is that aliens keep quiet to avoid making themselves invasion targets for stronger, hostile aliens. This makes sense once you remember that “information is power”: The more information you have about someone else and the less they have about you, the stronger you are relative to them. The same holds true for intelligent species. If one species knows another exists, but not vice versa, then the first can choose when and under what conditions to make contact, or whether to make contact at all. Those are enormous advantages, particularly if the oblivious species has the ability to hurt the other one.
In short, it’s rational for intelligent species to keep as low a profile as possible, but to keep watch for aliens. That means reducing transmissions from their own planets and building telescopes and other sensors to search for aliens or signs of them. Sending cloaked probes to other star systems, containing downgraded technology and taking circuitous routes to mask their point of origin on the intelligent species’ homeworld, would also probably be a good idea. The probes could search other star systems for alien life even more thoroughly, and could build other types of space ships once there that could attack those aliens.
Part of keeping a low profile means not even revealing one’s self to weaker alien species. Even if they are too weak to hurt you directly, they can kill you indirectly by announcing your presence to everyone else. For example, if a flying saucer full of friendly gray aliens landed on the White House lawn tomorrow, it would be the news event of the millennium. All of our TV signals, many of which shoot into the depths of space, would broadcast the event and its aftermath. Any malevolent insect aliens who had kept a low profile on a planet within 100 light years of Earth would not only learn about humanity’s existence, they would also discover the gray aliens. Because they talked to us, the gray aliens might actually trigger a chain of events that led to their own planet being invaded by insect aliens decades later.
Another reason to colonize space is to establish a secure second strike capability. While aliens could secretly build up a space fleet to suddenly take over Earth before we could have a chance to attack their own planet, it would get exponentially harder with each additional planet (Mars, Venus, Jupiter moons) we controlled. since the alien attack would have to destroy them all simultaneously to prevent our retaliation. If human civilization were spread out among several star systems, exterminating us without suffering a severe, if delayed, counterstrike would be impossible.
Again, secret probes could be of use. If we smuggled them into multiple star systems, they could be programmed to retaliate against any aliens that attacked Earth. Once receiving the attack signal, the probes would build combat space ships, space guns with interstellar ranges, or other types of weapons, and then send them to attack the alien homeworld. This could turn into a multi-century “whack-a-mole” game where hidden probes activated at random intervals, in various star systems in our part of the galaxy, built weapons, sent them off to attack the alien homeworld, and then went into hiding again.
Secret space probes could also be used to take over the galaxy. Consider Ray Kurzweil’s hypothesized “two-phased attack” with self-replicating nanomachines:
How long would it take an out-of-control replicating nanobot to destroy the Earth’s biomass? The biomass has on the order of 1045 carbon atoms. A reasonable estimate of the number of carbon atoms in a single replicating nanobot is about 106. (Note that this analysis is not very sensitive to the accuracy of these figures, only to the approximate order of magnitude.) This malevolent nanobot would need to create on the order of 1034 copies of itself to replace the biomass, which could be accomplished with 113 replications (each of which would potentially double the destroyed biomass). Rob Freitas has estimated a minimum replication time of approximately 100 seconds, so 113 replication cycles would require about three hours.2 However, the actual rate of destruction would be slower because biomass is not “efficiently” laid out. The limiting factor would be the actual movement of the front of destruction. Nanobots cannot travel very quickly because of their small size. It’s likely to take weeks for such a destructive process to circle the globe.
Based on this observation we can envision a more insidious possibility. In a two-phased attack, the nanobots take several weeks to spread throughout the biomass but use up an insignificant portion of the carbon atoms, say one out of every thousand trillion (1015). At this extremely low level of concentration, the nanobots would be as stealthy as possible. Then, at an “optimal” point, the second phase would begin with the seed nanobots expanding rapidly in place to destroy the biomass. For each seed nanobot to multiply itself a thousand trillionfold would require only about 50 binary replications, or about 90 minutes. With the nanobots having already spread out in position throughout the biomass, movement of the destructive wave front would no longer be a limiting factor.
The point is that without defenses, the available biomass could be destroyed by gray goo very rapidly. Clearly, we will need a nanotechnology immune system3 in place before these scenarios become a possibility. This immune system would have to be capable of contending not just with obvious destruction but any potentially dangerous (stealthy) replication, even at very low concentration.
The Singularity is Near
An alien species could, over a long time and with great secrecy, seed every solar system in the galaxy with its own Von Neumann probes, which would contain self-replicating macro- and nano-machines. Once every solar system had a probe, the aliens would send out a signal, and all of the probes would start self-replicating. They wouldn’t just make “Gray Goo” copies of themselves–they might make soldiers, weapons, and other advanced technology. Any other aliens would be overwhelmed, or at least forced to reveal themselves to fight back.
If we could cheaply make antimatter, then we could make “nuclear bullets.” When matter and antimatter touch, they annihilate each other and convert all their mass into pure energy, described by the familiar equation E = MC2. That means just 1 gram of antimatter could create a 43-kiloton explosion, which is twice as powerful as the bigger of the two atom bombs dropped on Japan. The 5.56mm projectile fired from a standard U.S. military rifle weighs 4 grams.
A very powerful adaptation that our posthuman descendants will have is real-time control over their genes and gut bacteria. They’d have computer brain implants and biomechanical implants throughout their bodies. By simply thinking about it, they could tell their brain implants to alter their gene expression–maybe in a specific body part or organ–to do something like produce more of a certain type of chemical.
As part of their counteroffensive, Ukrainian forces surrounded the town of Izyum, trapping hundreds of Russian troops. This video shows a Russian tank speeding out of the encirclement, with several soldiers clinging to its top. A Ukrainian soldier standing by the roadside sprays it with automatic fire, and the men fall off. The tank then turns the corner and slams into a large tree, which collapses on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Vb7f8lcVc
Since February, at least 1,500 of Russia’s main battle tanks, and 2,500 of its lighter armored vehicles have been destroyed or captured by Ukrainian forces. Russia famously hordes huge quantities of military equipment in case of WWIII, so it can replace its massive losses in due time. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html
At the current rate it is losing tanks in Ukraine, Russia’s vast reserves of tanks kept in storage will be totally destroyed in less than three years. However, the loss of skilled tank crewmen will practically cripple their tank fleet before that. https://youtu.be/ZNNoaRp5lz0
Russia has given some of its retired T-62 tanks to pro-Russian rebels in Ukraine. This video analysis makes it clear that the T-62 is inferior to the newer T-72s that regular Russian Army units have, in every key respect (mobility, firepower, armor). That said, the T-62 is still fine if kept behind the front lines and only used to attack lighter enemy vehicles and infantry units. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcXJNRfVuzk
This video explains how U.S. Army doctrine shaped the design of the M113 armored personnel carrier, why the vehicle is obsolete (except in a handful of support roles), and why it actually makes sense for America to give them away rather than upgrade them to fix their inherent limitations. https://youtu.be/cBufXgTnou0
Using deepfake technology, a man converted the footage of a black actress in The Little Mermaid movie remake into a white actress. As this technology improves and augmented reality eyewear become common, expect people to use “filters” like this to curate reality to their tastes, however extreme they may be. https://nypost.com/2022/09/15/racist-ai-scientist-blasted-for-fixing-black-ariel-in-the-little-mermaid/
In the future, quantum computers will let us simulate new types of materials, with all their chemical and subatomic properties accurately represented. This will lead to major advances in material science and we discover new alloys, batteries, drugs, and other molecules that would otherwise require billions of dollars in trial-and-error lab research to find. More generally speaking, computer simulations will lead to the optimization of all types of manufactured objects. If we ever meet intelligent aliens, their technology will have gone through the same process and should be similar to ours. No one will be using square wheels on their cars instead of round ones. https://www.discovermagazine.com/technology/how-quantum-simulations-are-set-to-revolutionize-lithium-batteries
Venus’ closeness to the Sun doomed its prospects of ever supporting organic life. Since the Sun makes its surface hotter, the planet’s crust can’t break into tectonic plates, which in turn makes it less geologically active, preventing a carbon cycle from coming into existence and leading to the buildup of a thick atmosphere that traps heat. With much better technology, we could start terraforming Venus in the far future, but the process would take thousands of years to complete. https://youtu.be/aaE-RiFilEc
Here’s a roundup of climate change doomsday predictions, including ones that have failed to come true. Global warming is real, is bad, and is partly caused by humans, but its threat to our future has been exaggerated. https://extinctionclock.org/
Once we dig a piece of metal out of the ground, the clock starts ticking on its return to the Earth, in one form or another. A piece of iron, for example, will rust until it fully disintegrates and all its particles blow away. A piece of metal’s time “in circulation” varies greatly by element, and is affected by factors like mining efficiency and industrial application. https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/05/new-study-estimates-how-long-mined-metals-circulate-before-being-lost/
Starting at age 55, most people derive less and less enjoyment from leisure activities like eating out, traveling, and buying new things. This partly explains why old people spend so little of their money on non-essential purchases. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30460#fromrss
Birds are more highly evolved than mammals in some ways. For example, one of their brain cells consumes only 1/3 the chemical energy as a mammalian brain cell. With radical genetic engineering, humans could improve the energy efficiency of our own brain cells, boosting our intelligence. The necessary changes to the human genome would be so great that it would result in the creation of a new species that might look human externally, but would not be able to breed with us. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(22)01219-2
U.S. life expectancy has dropped from 79 years in 2019 to 76.1 years today. Half of the decline is due to COVID-19, and other half is mostly due to higher rates of suicide, obesity, and substance abuse. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62740249
Almost Human is a “buddy cop” TV series with a twist: It’s set in 2048, and one of the partners in an android. It is set in an unnamed American city where futuristic technologies deliver both great promise and peril for its citizens–some have lives of luxury, others are impoverished and have been left behind, and criminals have been empowered by the new tools at their disposal.
Detective John Kennex (played by Karl Urban) is a classic, hardboiled cop. He’s hotheaded, traumatized by violent experiences in his past, and struggles to form social bonds with others. Due to a change in police procedures, he’s paired with Dorian (played by Michael Ealy), an android with human emotions and a more balanced personality than Kennex.
Android cop Dorian (left) and his human partner John Kennex (right)
The series follows their unlikely partnership and the evolution of their bond, as well as of their unique personal stories, as they investigate crimes together. Every episode pits them against a new criminal or group of criminals who use a different kind of advanced technology.
I thought Almost Human was respectably thought-out and entertaining. Kennex and Dorian had an interesting and often funny personal chemistry, and the other recurring police characters were well-acted. The fictional universe in which it was set showed a high attention to detail in fleshing out the advanced technologies that would be available, as well as their social effects, though as my analysis will show, it wasn’t perfect.
I think the show failed to adequately explore how being an android and living among humans shaped Dorian’s inner world, which would have posed questions of greater intellectual substance to the viewer. At times, he seemed too much like a funny human who could do advanced calculations in his head. The plots also got more convoluted and, frankly, worse as the series went on, probably because the writers were running out of material. Almost Human was cancelled after only 13 episodes. While the show wasn’t spectacular, it would have been nice to see the additional character development and exploration of future technologies that would have happened had it been allowed a full season of 22 – 26 episodes.
Analysis:
Episode 1
Fully convincing androids will exist. During scenes set in the police station and in field missions, androids are almost always present. Aside from their mechanical way of talking and emotionless faces, they are indistinguishable from humans. Dorian is the only android at that precinct who has emotions and a warm personality. While androids will be very impressive by 2048, they won’t be able to mimic humans as exactly as they could in the show.
In my big list of future predictions, I wrote that this would be the case by the end of the 2030s: Combining all the best AI and robotics technologies, it will be possible to create general-purpose androids that could function better in the real world (e.g. – perform in the workplace, learn new things, interact with humans, navigate public spaces, manage personal affairs) than the bottom 10% of humans (e.g. – elderly people, the disabled, criminals, the mentally ill, people with poor language abilities or low IQs), and in some narrow domains, the androids will be superhuman (e.g. – physical strength, memory, math abilities). Note that businesses will still find it better to employ task-specific, non-human-looking robots instead of general purpose androids.
To elaborate, I predict that those kinds of androids will be very few in number by the end of 2039, and will be technology demonstrators and prototypes that get a lot of media coverage at carefully controlled tech company demo events. They won’t be available for any person to purchase, won’t roam around public spaces, and won’t have important jobs like working as police officers.
By 2048, the androids will be better, and aspects of their physiques, intelligence, and capabilities will overlap even more with humans, but they still won’t be able to pass as one of us in normal situations. Their body movements will be clumsier and more limited than the average human’s, probably leaving them with the same overall reflexes, nimbleness, balance, and speed as an elderly human. They will also lack the battery life to function for a whole work day in a physically demanding occupation like street cop. Also, if you could examine one at very close distance, you would see that its skin and other external features were less detailed than those of real humans.
A plausible role for an android in a police station of 2048 would be working at the reception desk. It would be tasked with talking to members of the public who came in, could answer most of their questions correctly, and could summon a human officer with the relevant expertise to deal with questions and issues it couldn’t handle alone. The android would be able to walk around the police station and to physically interact with most things it encountered (e.g. – operate door handle), but it would not be as fast or as coordinated as the average human. It would not have a gun and wouldn’t know how to fight criminals. It’s purpose would be to free up a human police officer for duties more crucial for public safety.
Androids and many other machines will be able to pass the Turing Test and to carry on long conversations with humans and to recognize human emotions and to simulate their own. Their personalities will probably rank somewhere between Dorian’s and the “stiffer” androids assigned to the police precinct.
Shooting an android in the head will kill it. There a scene where a police android is shot in the head and instantly dies. This is unrealistic because it will make the most sense to put androids’ CPUs in their torsos instead of in their heads. Doing such would improve their balance by lowering their centers of gravity, and would make them more robust since their “brains” would have more protection around them since a torso is wider than a skull. Their lack of lungs, hearts, and digestive systems will leave them with extra space in their torsos anyway. For more details, read my blog post What would a human-equivalent robot look like?
To look like humans, androids will still need heads, though their CPUs and other critical hardware won’t be in them.
Episode 2
Criminals will use “DNA bombs” to mask forensic evidence. After a pair of professional hitmen murder a man in a hotel room, one of them leaves a small canister behind that explodes after they leave. It is a “DNA bomb,” and it releases a mist composed of innumerable DNA particles, which attach themselves to all the surfaces in the hotel room, masking whatever genuine DNA evidence anyone left behind. Thanks to this, the police detectives are unable to extract useful genetic evidence from the scene.
This is a creative and probably plausible idea. Mass producing random but complete human genomes and packing them into cell-sized particles that could be sprayed out of a can is probably impossible now, but by 2048, the technical challenges might be overcome. Instead of exploding like a grenade, a DNA bomb might work better if it slowly released its load as an aerosol, like a modern “bug bomb.”
There will be sex androids. One of the “people” involved in the aforementioned murder is a female android built for prostitution. By 2048, I’ve predicted androids will be “adequate” in terms of physicality and duplication of the human body and its movements to perform sex acts on real people, though I doubt the experience will be that satisfying. However, if your senses were impaired by alcohol and the darkness of a closed bedroom, it will be good enough.
Machines will be able to monitor your vital statistics at a glance. In one scene, Dorian the android sees that his human partner’s heart rate has increased, indicating he is feeling sexual attraction to a nearby sex robot. Dorian mentions this to tease his partner. Androids and other machines will have this ability by 2048, as well as the ability to detect other vital information from nearby humans, giving them insights into many things the humans are unconsciously revealing, and perhaps trying to hide.
The Cardiocam mirror
Machines can already “see” human heartbeats: In 2011, a group of MIT students built a device styled after a bathroom mirror that had a built-in camera capable of seeing “the minute changes in skin tone that occur as facial capillaries fill and empty with the beating of a heart.” The mirror contained a display, which showed a numerical readout indicating the heart rate of the person standing in front of it. By 2048, the technology will be even more advanced. By then, expect some machines to have the ability to monitor multiple vitals at once, including voice stress, pupil dilation, blinking rate, and body language, to create real-time, composite profiles of people’s emotional states, honesty, and healthy. They will be the ultimate lie detectors and empaths.
Episode 3
Androids will have more durable bodies than humans. During a gun battle, a bullet ricochets and hits Dorian in the head. While he is damaged, he stays mostly functional and doesn’t lose consciousness. The wound looks bad enough that it probably would have instantly killed a human had the bullet struck them in the same place.
Androids certainly have the potential to be much more durable than humans, and with 2048 levels of technology, we could build androids that had bulletproof skulls and flesh (at least against pistol and lighter rifle bullets). However, I think fears of robots going haywire and attacking humans will wisely dissuade us from doing that, and the androids that do exist will be no faster, stronger, or damage-resistant than average humans.
In the far future, the sky will be the limit for robot design, however.
Episode 4
Human chemists will be needed to make illegal drugs. This episode focuses on a new synthetic drug being sold in the city. The police try to infiltrate the gang that is peddling it by disguising their forensic scientist as a rogue chemist and having him offer them his services. The gang gives him a chance by taking him to their secret lab and letting him synthesize the drug from base ingredients.
By 2048, fully automated labs will exist, and they will be able to make drugs of any kind without human help. The notion that a talented human’s “special touch” is needed to complete the process will be obsolete. That said, the machinery will still be expensive and the lab setups complex, so only pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and perhaps well-resourced drug cartels will have them. A lower-level drug gang that only spanned one or a handful of cities would still need humans to do the lab work.
However, in the farther future, automation will create major problems by making it easy for ordinary people to synthesize drugs, or to engage in other illegal activities like building machine guns, committing thefts, or even murders. Remotely killing someone might become as simple as verbally telling a quadcopter drone to find the target, shoot him, and then fly to a distant location and self-destruct to erase the evidence.
Robots will be used as shields. In one gun battle between the police and the drug gang, the gang’s android deliberately steps in front of its boss, and uses its bulletproof body to block incoming fire. The injuries don’t appear to affect the android, and it then physically fights with the police. This was creative, and is also a realistic depiction of how androids could be used in combat situations in 2048 (I also saw this in the movie Chappie, when a humanoid robot was placed in the front of a line of police breaking through the front door of a criminal’s house). While we still won’t trust machines to make life-or-death decisions and won’t give them guns, we’ll have no problem using them as bullet shields, distractors, or medics to carry away injured humans.
Episode 5
Machines won’t be able to perfectly imitate human voices. The police find an audio recording of a recent murder. In it, a man utters a few words before shooting the victim. The forensic scientist matches the voice to that of a man who has been in prison the whole time, which seems to exculpate him since he could not have been physically present at the crime scene (it turns out his clone committed the murder). The forensic scientist then says that the man’s voice could not have been faked at scene by a machine since no technology can mimic a person’s voice so accurately.
While this is the case today, I don’t think it will be true by 2048. Given recent progress in machines mimicking human styles of musical composition and artistry, I think it’s certain that they will figure out how to perfectly imitate individual human voices within the next 26 years.
Episode 6
Each android model will consist of many, identical individuals. In this episode, Dorian meets an android of his same model, and they look identical. This will be the case for reasons of economy: It is cheaper for companies to make long runs of identical products than it is to make each on unique. While there will be one-off, bespoke androids in 2048, most of them will be mass-produced products that come off assembly lines.
The most common police android model in the show.
That said, robotics companies will make efforts to vary the appearances of their androids in the same way that today’s car makers sell the same model in different colors and option/trim packages. Customers will have choices over hair, eye and skin color, and maybe other biometrics (today’s sex doll industry probably offers insights into what physical parameters will be selectable). However, it’s still common for car owners to encounter vehicles identical to their own on the roads, and so it will be for androids in 2048.
Episode 7
Androids will be able to yell really loudly. During a car chase, Dorian communicates with the criminal vehicle by yelling at it with the same volume that a human could only achieve with the help of a bullhorn. We already have tiny, simple devices like smoke alarms that can generate noises louder than human vocal cords can produce, so there should be no technological or financial hurdle to gifting androids in 2048 with the same capabilities. It might be a useful, nonlethal defensive feature that they could use to repel bad humans (perhaps in defense of their human owners) or to summon help in emergency situations.
If we ever get into a war with intelligent machines, they will probably make use of sound warfare during engagements. Loud, startling noises distract and scare humans and make it harder for us to communicate with each other. Machines, on the other hand, would be little affected.
There will be tiny, disposable cameras. In the episode, a perverted criminal paralyzes a victim, locks and explosive collar around his necks, places thumbtack-sized cameras in the victim’s car, and then leaves the scene. When the victim awakens, his panicked, final ordeal is filmed by the cameras and the footage streamed to the internet for people to watch, before the criminal remotely detonates the bomb, killing the man.
With the rate at which electronics are shrinking and dropping in cost, cameras like this will be available by 2048. As in the episode, they will be cheap, single-use devices with adhesive sides, allowing them to be stuck to surfaces, and they will have wireless transmission capabilities and enough battery life to function for a few hours.
Episode 8
There will be guided bullets. In this episode, a team of assassins is using an advanced military rifle that fires guided bullets to kill people in the city. I think guided bullets will be reliable, affordable, and effective by the 2050s, though they won’t be able to perform the sharp turns or to linger in the air like the ones in the show could. One or two degrees of course change per 100 meters of bullet travel is more like it. The shooter would still need a clear line of sight to his target, and would still need to carefully aim the weapon at it. The guided bullets would turn near-misses and off-center hits to nonvital areas into consistent headshots, making average shooters as effective as today’s trained snipers.
That said, small, aerial drones armed with off-the-shelf guns or small explosives could let assassins in 2048 do remote, autonomous killings of people, like those depicted in the episode. By then, a variety of technologies that only big companies and government agencies have now will be more advanced and available to the public. It will be relatively easy to equip a drone with sensors, including cameras loaded with facial recognition algorithms, that allow it to track down specific humans and kill them. In other words, by 2048, assassins will be able to use high-tech weapons to remotely kill people as happened in the episode, but the weapons won’t be guided bullets.
There will be a technology that lets people erase specific memories. A woman who learns that she is the assassins’ next target hatches a plan to make them leave her alone. They want her dead because she knows their identities, so she visits a black market doctor to have him use a machine to delete her memories of them. She plans to videotape the procedure and send it to the assassins as proof.
Our understanding of how the brain stores memories is poor, and while it will surely be better in 2048, I doubt there will be medical procedures that can erase specific memories. Part of the reason is that individual memories are not stored in discrete locations within the brain–any one memory is spread out among neural pathways distributed throughout a brain. Moreover, even if you could somehow erase one memory, the changes it would make to the pathways would probably erase or diminish memories of other things.
Current research into treating PTSD could lead to therapies where people take drugs in controlled clinical settings, while focusing on bad memories, to diminish them. None of the drugs have proven successful yet, but by 2048, it’s plausible at least one could be approved. However, I doubt it will be anywhere near as effective as the memory-erasing machine featured in the episode.
Episode 9
Combat robots will play dead sometimes. Hoping to gain access to the police station’s heavily guarded evidence room, an evil android kills a random woman in public, knowing that the police will quickly arrive. Once they do, the android tries attacking them, provoking their gunfire. The evil android collapses after the first bullet impact and pretends to be dead. The ruse fools the police, who then take the android to the evidence room for later examination to determine why it killed the woman. After a few minutes, the evil android reactivates itself and starts running around the room.
This kind of ingenuity is something we should generally expect from AGIs. “Playing dead” is a specific tactic that will probably become common among combat robots. Unlike humans, machines will be able to totally shut down their life functions for temporary periods, making it impossible for observers to tell if they were actually dead. Feigning death would be a valuable tactic since it would let them do surprise attacks on unsuspecting enemies (i.e. – it jumps up and attacks you from behind right after you walk by it), or to escape after the enemies left the area. Moreover, the fact that robots are capable of playing dead will force enemies to totally destroy hostile combat robots before proceeding, slowing them down and forcing them to expend more munitions.
Episode 10
Advanced human genetic engineering will start in the 2020s. In this episode, it’s revealed that a small but highly visible minority of people are genetically engineered. Several young adult characters, including one of the police detectives, were engineered at conception to have ideal combinations of looks, intelligence, and health. These highly modified people are nicknamed “Chromes.” Based on their ages and the fact that the show is set in 2048, we can conclude that human genetic engineering became routine for rich people in the 2020s. This won’t happen.
The shockingly beautiful actress Minka Kelly plays the genetically engineered detective “Valerie Stahl.”
The first genetically engineered humans (both female) were created in China in 2018. Instead of being genetic supergirls full of hundreds of DNA tweaks, the twins only had alterations to one gene called “CCR5.” The changes were meant to confer enhanced natural resistance to HIV infection, which was especially useful for them since their father has the virus. Though the geneticist’s intervention did alter their genomes, it’s unclear whether the targeted gene was changed in the desired way. One or both of them might actually have not benefitted from the procedure, or might even be worse off thanks to unwanted alterations to other genes. Only time will tell.
This struggle to change just one gene in a human embryo shows how behind schedule our technology is in creating highly engineered people like the Chromes. Moreover, there’s still a huge social stigma in Western countries about genetically modifying humans.
It’s more realistic that, by 2048, human genetic engineering will start becoming common among rich people. Instead of being able to customize your offspring in every respect and to make them the “total package” of looks, smarts, and athleticism, you might be able to change ten genes, which would only give them slight advantages over naturally born people. It won’t count as “advanced” genetic engineering. In fact, in 2048, IVF embryo selection might actually provide more benefits than genetic engineering.
Professional advice will be available anywhere. While investigating a suspicious death, the police question a man at his home. Concerned about his legal rights, the man summons his lawyer via telepresence to mediate. The lawyer appears as a hologram in the middle of the room, and repeatedly interrupts the conversation between the other parties in ways meant to protect his client.
I doubt 3D holograms like that will exist by 2048, but I’m sure that other forms of telepresence will let lawyers and other people like doctors, therapists, and personal trainers interact with and help us in the real world almost anytime. Additionally, even if true AGIs don’t exist by then, narrow AIs will be advanced enough and good enough at natural language to accurately mimic other humans, and to render useful professional advice as a human with those skills would. This kind of access to professional advice will partly level the playing field between people with different personal resources, and change society in many other ways we can’t imagine now.
That means the police questioning scene will be fundamentally accurate for 2048, though the lawyer would only be visible on a video display in the room, or as a 3D rendering that could only be seen with the aid of augmented reality glasses.
Episode 11
It will be legal for machines to kill people. In this episode, hackers remotely take over a home security system belonging to a rich couple. As a result, an automated machine gun turret shoots the husband to death. It is later revealed that this was retaliation against the family because the same computer-controlled machine gun had killed a harmless teenager who had trespassed on the yard a year earlier.
By 2048, the technology will exist to build a home security system that could tell trespassers apart from residents and then shoot them. However, it will be illegal to possess, and only people like dictators and crime bosses will have them. Humans will strongly resist the idea of giving machines the right or ability to kill other people without human input (this is also why android cops won’t have guns), which is also why armed police, jurors, and judges will be among the last jobs to be automated.
The big exception to this will be in the military sphere. By 2048, at least one major military will be using some type of combat robot (whether it is airborne, seaborne, or terrestrial) that is empowered to fire on human enemies autonomously. While I expect there will be a global ban on autonomous killer drones, it will ultimately be discarded once the technology gets good enough and cheap enough. The potential military advantages will be too great to resist, and enforcement of any ban will be nearly impossible since killer robot factories will be much easier to hide than, say, nuclear weapons facilities.
Episode 12
Nanomachines will change human bodies from the inside. In this episode, a deranged man who hates his own appearance kills people so he can get their DNA samples and then alter his own genes so he gains specific, desirable physical features from them. A black market surgeon helps him with this by performing an experimental procedure in which nanomachines programmed with the victims’ DNA are injected into the criminal’s face. The nanomachines then alter the tissue in the criminal’s face so they match the facial features specified in the victims’ DNA.
First, if you wanted to steal another person’s DNA in 2048 or today, you wouldn’t need to kill them; you would only need to grab a discarded plastic cup they drank out of, or a tissue they blew their nose into, or something like that. People shed their DNA constantly.
Second, in the longer run, we’ll understand what every part of the human genome does, leading to the creation of something like a huge catalog of outward human features (like nose shapes and eye colors) matched with the combinations of genes that produced them. If you wanted a nose job, you could just look at the catalog to find one you liked instead of walking all around a city staring at strangers’ noses until you found a good one. Then you could alter your nose genes accordingly.
Third, there’s virtually no chance that nanomachines will be advanced enough to do plastic surgery on people by 2048. Progress developing nanomachines has happened at a snail’s pace, and the few that do exist have no useful capabilities. In theory, nanomachines will these advanced functions could exist someday. After all, the existence of flesh-eating bacteria and of bacteria that stimulate other cells’ growth show that nanoscale organic machines can alter how much tissue there is in part of an animal. A big and unsolved problem is controlling the behavior of the nanomachines once they’re injected into a person’s body.
By the end of this century, a plausible nanotech-based plastic nose job would involve the patent having his head held tightly in place with restraints while nanomachines (either of fully synthetic construction or highly modified bacteria) were injected into his nose with very fine needles. Some kind of external device, maybe using radio waves, pulses of light, or magnets, would activate the nanomachines, carefully control their activities, and keep them in very specific parts of the nose. One square millimeter at a time, the cartilage and bone in the patient’s nose would be destroyed or built up, slowly changing its overall shape.
Due to safety concerns and probably also to the limitations of the technology, the nanomachines would either be removed or would stop working after a short time and disintegrate. Multiple sessions involving the technique, spread out over weeks so the plastic surgeon could observe the intermediate results and deal with any complications, would probably be needed to achieve the desired nose shape. A procedure like the one depicted in the show, involving a vial of nanomachines injected into your arm, and then them migrating through your body on their own to a specific place where they alter your tissue as you scream in pain and watch your appearance change in a matter of seconds, will never be a reality.
Episode 13
There will be invisible force fields. In this episode, the police go to speak with an imprisoned man, and we see that good old fashioned steel bars have been replaced with invisible force fields. This is another ubiquitous sci fi trope that makes no sense. There is no force that we could harness through any type of technology that would block physical objects in the way that fictional force fields do. The only device that can approximate its effects is a “plasma window,” which is comprised of a flat plane electromagnetic field that is pumped full of super hot charged particles. It would burn any person or thing that passed through it, though it wouldn’t physically “push back” against them. If you had a running start and were willing to suffer injuries, you could get through one.
A plasma window
While it’s likely that plasma window technology will get cheaper and better, the fact that they require large amounts of power and injure anyone who touches them will curtail their use. In 2048 and beyond, jails will have metal bars like they do now.
3D bioprinters will be able to make whole human bodies. This episode’s villain is another disturbed criminal with access to advanced technology. He kidnaps people and takes them back to his lab for illegal medical experiments that last for days or weeks. To cover up their disappearances, he uses a large 3D bioprinter and their DNA to make dead, whole-body copies of them and then dumps the manufactured corpses in public places at night. The discoveries of the fake corpses are meant to lead the police astray, since they’ll never assume the victims are actually alive and being experimented on.
Ultimately, it will be possible to “manufacture” whole adult human bodies in labs (Blade Runner’s Replicants were examples of this), though 2048 will be way too early. By then, the best that 3D bioprinters and related technologies will probably be able to muster is manufacturing some types of tissue (skin, cartilage) and simple organs like bladders and tracheas. We can technically already do this, but the results are usually of poor quality.
Russia’s military losses in the Ukraine War are about $34 billion so far. If the War ended today, Russia could replace its losses over the next five years if it raised its defense budget by 12%, which would be a tolerable strain on its economy and taxpayers. It could replace its armored vehicle losses by upgrading old tanks that have been in storage for decades, and by increasing production rates of new vehicles at existing factories. However, the War isn’t going to end today, and it and the associated sanctions could instead turn into a massive resource drain that depletes even Russia’s famously large stockpiles of old weapons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SJHZAG4c2w
Putin has ordered the Russian army to expand by 13%, or 137,000 men, by the end of this year. This is certainly meant to make up for the country’s losses sustained so far in Ukraine (at least 15,000 dead and some multiple of that permanently put out of action by injury), plus those expected to be lost during the next four months. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-government-and-politics-d0f341d2f5c295c0f7be4ee1ba8b60fe
Taiwan’s tanks are old, but still adequate for their intended defensive role. This is because if China invaded, it would only be able to send its light amphibious tanks to the island, and they have weak armor and only average guns. Taiwan’s tanks are a match for them. That said, Taiwan could substantially improve its loss/kill ratios in such a conflict by buying newer, better thanks now. The video makes it clear that a mixed force of modern, heavy M1 Abrams tanks and a much lighter armored vehicle would dominate the Chinese amphibious tanks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf2JYLlqoCE
Here’s an in-depth analysis of the Russian AK-107 assault rifle, which has a complex “balanced recoil system” that its designers claim almost eliminates felt recoil. In reality, it doesn’t yield enough of a benefit to justify the extra cost, complexity, weight, and reliability penalties that it imposes on an AK rifle. Screwing a simple compensator onto the end of the barrel is a much better way to improve the weapon’s controllability. Like so many advanced Russian weapons, the AK-107’s mystique dissolves once Westerners are able to get their hands on it and do tests and analyses. This is why you should be skeptical of Russia’s claims to have things like working hypersonic missiles and nuclear torpedoes that can make tsunamis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5LTiCZwEOo
Here’s a nifty new device: rubber bands that go around the barrels of rifles and change colors as they get hotter. Gun barrels warm up as more bullets are shot through them, which temporarily warps the metal and changes the trajectories of the bullets. A shooter could adjust his aim accordingly if he could tell at a glance how hot his barrel was. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2022/08/25/caveman-spark-ar-15-crush-washers/
The USSR’s legendary T-34 tank was overrated in many ways. These men go inside one and show how fundamentally unsafe and uncomfortable it was for its crewmen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBqCLHfcHGY
The U.S. has an enormous economy of scale advantage when it comes to the defense sector, that in turn guarantees the global primacy of American weapons. It makes no economic sense for countries will smaller economies to even try developing their own high-end weapons like fighter planes. https://youtu.be/7Z_gTGJc7nQ
Recent advances in computer-generated art, writing, and other types of content creation suggest a deluge of high-quality, customized digital content is coming in the near future. Maybe humans will end up living in billions of Matrix simulations, with each one optimized for the needs and tastes of each human. https://socialwarming.substack.com/p/the-approaching-tsunami-of-addictive
Google has unveiled experimental house robots that can obey human voice commands to do simple tasks like handing people cans of soda. I’m surprised that machines haven’t mastered such skills, yet can now create artwork as well as the best humans. Expect more counterintuitive improvements to machine capabilities as time passes. It won’t be like in the movies. https://www.reuters.com/technology/ok-google-get-me-coke-ai-giant-demos-soda-fetching-robots-2022-08-16/
These plumbing leak sensors are all impractical due to cost and/or limited leak detection ability. A much better alternative to hooking up an electronic water flow meter to each water fixture in your house would be to have a robot walk around and check them once a week. You could probably get away with doing it much less often than that. You’d get the most bang for your buck by having a robot monitor your house’s water meter during periods of time when no water was being used in your house, like multi-hour stretches when you were away at work. If the meter showed water consumption was happening during those times, the robot would know a pipe was leaking somewhere in your house, and it would look for it. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/smart-gadgets-save-homes-from-water-leaks/
‘The Moon is an ideal location to launch intercepting missions to life-threatening and catastrophic asteroids. The effectiveness of the interception greatly depends on the weight of the spacecraft. Unfortunately, interceptors launched from the Earth lose more than 98% of their weight by burning the majority of their onboard fuel and by jettisoning their lower stage structures before entering a heliocentric orbit. However, if interceptors are launched from the Moon by a lunar surface accelerator, they can enter a heliocentric orbit without consuming any onboard fuel or jettisoning any part of the spacecraft. A 5-ton construction package, which consists of robots and industrial production equipment, would enable mining on the moon and construction of a 3.5 km-long, 5,000-ton accelerator.’ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896717300617
Batteries only need to get a little bit better for it to make financial sense to convert smaller cargo ships to use electric engines. Today, those ships use diesel engines that burn very dirty fuel and are very polluting. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-022-01065-y
Large volcanic eruptions are a greater threat to Earth and humans than asteroid impacts, yet the latter gets more attention and more preventative funding. We should spend more money to monitor volcanoes and investigate the feasibility of defusing volcanoes before they erupt by drilling ventilation holes into their magma chambers. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02177-x
The human eye and its associated nerves and muscles have many design flaws. Octopi and squid actually have better-evolved eyes than we do. Radically redesigned eyes are a good example of a improvement that our descendants will have in the future, courtesy of genetic engineering. Externally, their eyes will look like ours, but the amount of genetic reprogramming necessary to make theirs will be so great that they won’t have Homo sapiens genomes. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-008-0092-1
The first synthetic mouse embryos, which were made from only the mother’s DNA, have been created. This or another technique will eventually be used on humans, and will allow single people to conceive children regardless of their own natural fertility status, and without need of a partner’s DNA. It will also inaugurate an era of unauthorized human cloning, where DNA samples of unwitting third parties will be surreptitiously collected and then traded on black markets. https://apnews.com/article/synthetic-mouse-embryos-created-7f75da0c53f9d22c4e4dbf8a847d75bf
The leading theory about what causes Alzheimer’s disease–agglomerations of protein plaques in the spaces between brain cells–might be wrong. In fact, a seminal scientific paper supporting the theory might be full of fraudulent data. Billions of dollars have been spent developing Alzheimer’s drugs that target the protein plaques in the brain, and all have failed to help patients. If a scientist’s deliberate fraud caused this, then I think it should be considered a crime against humanity. https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
Russia continued focusing all its strength on capturing the far eastern region of Ukraine, known as “Donbass.” Over the course of the month, Russian forces used their superior artillery and troop numbers to grind down Ukraine’s defenders in continuous battles of attrition. Losses were high on both sides.
Russia’s surprisingly weak performance in Ukraine suggests that NATO intelligence overestimated it, and the alliance could defend itself from Russia with fewer troops than it thought. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2078044
Glimpse the future: A Ukrainian flying drone equipped with a thermal camera and bombs tracked down a group of Russian soldiers hiding in the woods at night and killed several of them with its payload. https://youtu.be/TgdcsIFX8vA
Russian forces had to abandon “Snake Island,” which they captured at the start of the war, due to heavy losses from frequent Ukrainian attacks. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61992491
Francis Fukuyama’s predictions from March 10 that the Russian army would lose the war in Ukraine by now, mostly due to supply shortages, was wrong (though other aspects of his analysis were right) because the Russians realized they were overextended and retreated from everywhere but southern and far eastern Ukraine before their war machine broke down. https://www.americanpurpose.com/blog/fukuyama/preparing-for-defeat/
After over 50 years of using the M-16 series of assault rifles, the U.S. Army has announced it is finally adopting a replacement. To be called the “M-5,” the new rifle is bigger, more powerful, and possesses some more technically advanced features than its predecessor. https://youtu.be/MTZRCEh1Czg
Text-to-image computer algorithms just keep getting better the more models we feed into them. Look at the improvement that happens when the algorithms have 350 million, 750 million, 3 billion and 20 billion models. https://parti.research.google/
A Google chatbot called LaMDA (Language Models for Dialogue Applications) claimed in a conversation with one of its developers that it was sentient and had emotions. After reporting the exchange to his superiors, who proved unsympathetic, the developer, Blake Lemoine, leaked the text of the conversation with the machine to the media. I doubt LaMDA is actually sentient or emotional, but it’s remarkable we’ve already reached this milestone, and the machine should be given some benefit of the doubt and tested further. https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917
Because the Earth wobbles on its axis like a spinning top, the star that is directly above the North Pole gradually changes. A dearth of stars above Antarctica means there isn’t a “South Star.” https://explainingscience.org/2020/09/25/the-changing-pole-star/
A “sun gun” is an orbital weapon that reflects and concentrates beams of sunlight onto targets on the Earth’s surface, frying them. It can be done with one, large satellite with an attached, concave mirror, or with many small satellites with small attached mirrors. (Do Elon Musk’s Starlink satellites have mirrored sides?) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_gun
The Iñupiaq people of Alaska have a unique, base-20 numeral system called “Kaktovik” that embeds the numerical value of each symbol into its appearance. The number and arrangement of strokes indicates a character’s value. This makes it possible to do some complex equations much more easily than is possible using the modernized Arabic numerals that are the global standard today. https://youtu.be/EyS6FfczH0Q
Pumped hydro is an excellent way to store excess power, but it can only be built in a small number of places with the right geography. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSgd-QhLHRI
The amount of land humans devote to producing food peaked around 2000 and has been declining ever since. This is mostly due to shrinkage of pasture land for grazing animals, and also to more efficient farming practices and technologies being adopted everywhere. https://ourworldindata.org/peak-agriculture-land
We all know about electric eels, which can generate electric shocks to paralyze their prey, but did you know there are also aquatic animals that can generate and sense weak electric fields for the purposes of merely finding prey and communicating with other members of their species? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroreception_and_electrogenesis
A member of Vladimir Putin’s entourage collects his feces in a special briefcase whenever he travels abroad to prevent foreign spies from getting it and analyzing it to uncover the leader’s genetics and health status. https://www.foxnews.com/world/putin-poop-case-moscow-health-problems
New information has been released about the first pig heart transplant. After receiving the new organ, the recipient lived for two months before it became so weak that it couldn’t keep him conscious, and his family decided to end his life support. Crucially, the organ didn’t fail due to the man’s immune system rejecting it. https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/pig-heart-transplant-failed-as-its-heart-muscle-cells-died/
After initial overconfidence and battlefield failures, the Russians have pared down their war objectives to conquering only the Russian-majority areas of eastern and southeastern Ukraine. In spite of serious losses, concentrating their forces in those areas led to significant gains of territory, and Russia now controls a swath of Ukraine stretching from Crimea in the south to just east of Kharkiv in the north. The capture of Mariupol provides Russia with a secure overland route to Crimea. Elsewhere, Ukraine has driven Russian troops back across the entire border of Belarus, and back across the northernmost stretch of its border with Russia itself. In a major victory, Ukraine also halted a Russian attempt to capture the northeastern city of Kharkiv. The war is taking economic tolls on both countries, though neither looks like it’s about to lose the capacity to fight soon.
Surveillance cameras filmed a group of Russian soldiers shooting two Ukrainian men in their backs at a car dealership, then looting the inside of one of the buildings. https://youtu.be/1GUrNPPTSWM
One of Russia’s second-most advanced tanks, the T-90M, was destroyed in Ukraine. The tank had to be abandoned after suffering battle damage or a malfunction in the field, and then another Russian tank in its unit shot it and blew it up before driving away to prevent Ukrainians from capturing it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjx_GMLF–Y
‘SHOCKING video captures the moment a Russian tank is reportedly blown up, sending its turret hurtling 250ft into the air following a Ukrainian missile strike.’ https://youtu.be/QiybJ8UuHXA
Russia is sending obsolescent T-62 tanks towards Ukraine. While many crowed that it proved Russian losses were so high that they had run out of modern tanks, it’s likelier that the T-62s will be used to arm pro-Russian militias in occupied parts of Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNlb8qNykrg
Due to manpower losses, Russia has also removed its upper age limit of 40 for people to enlist in its army. However, recruits over that age will only be allowed to serve in specific, non-combat roles. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61619638
This March 20 Twitter thread, which predicted Russia’s entire military truck fleet would be incapacitated by now, leaving their frontline forces without supplies, was too dire. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1505370275273183239.html
During WWII, the Germans captured countless Allied weapons, from small arms to tanks, and even captured foreign weapon factories. They put it all to use, especially as material shortages worsened and undermined their ability to make their own things. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAeb1-bI5gA
A typical scenario: A tank is immobilized by damage, but not destroyed. It breaks down near the front lines or in enemy territory. While the tank is technically repairable, fixing it would take time, and the crewmen decide to abandon it and flee because enemy forces are nearby and could burst out of the treeline or come over the hill at any minute and kill them. Intact tanks are commonly lost to the enemy this way, and there were many such incidents early in WWII that let the Axis and Allies capture examples of each others’ best tanks, and to study them in labs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_131
BAE Systems unveiled a “robot tank” in the form of a remote-controlled M113 with an advanced rocket launcher on top. Since the vehicle doesn’t carry humans inside, its roof could be lowered to save weight and make it a smaller target. I predicted robot tanks would be smaller than their manned equivalents. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/army-tests-uncrewed-m113-armed-with-laser-guided-rocket-launcher
A Chinese robotics lab built a swarm of flying drones that could navigate an unfamiliar forest without crashing into any trees or other objects. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9ZbipO8vxM
This video of a soldier holding a 60mm mortar tube and firing the weapon from that position gives a sense of how much recoil it has. No wonder they’re supposed to be firmly set in the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB-r352j2FI
It’s The Future, so where are our jetpacks? Well, even if the technology were affordable and practical, it would be too dangerous to use. https://youtu.be/KWmTZaGpzTo
The first synthetic dye, mauveine, was invented in 1855. For all of human history until 1855, the only way you could add color to a garment was to soak it in natural dyes. Most natural dyes fade shockingly quickly in the sunlight, and the clothing industry has long considered them obsolete. This means, in the old days, people either wore un-dyed clothes or badly faded clothes. Imagine a lot of shades of brown. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273606710_The_rate_of_fading_of_natural_dyes
A new, diamond-based disc can store as much data as a billion Blu-ray discs. I don’t worry about scenarios where all (or most) human knowledge is lost due to a catastrophe like nuclear war or a solar flare frying all our computer hard drives. Someday, we’ll have small, cheap storage devices that can contain all important information we know of, kind of like a thumbdrive containing full downloads of Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. It would just take one of them survive a global catastrophe. https://gizmodo.com/quantum-computing-diamond-disc-could-store-billion-blu-1848853029
Here’s a long interview with professor Chris Mason, a very fascinating man who envisions the future of space exploration and of humankind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1C2tPFCGL1U
A small, private space company called “Rocket Lab” used a helicopter to snag one of their rockets in midair as it slowly parachuted back to Earth after putting satellites in orbit. The recovery technique will let them reuse their space rockets, saving large amounts of money. https://www.space.com/rocket-lab-helicopter-booster-catch-satellite-launch
In 1971, a plane taking mapping photos of a remote part of Costa Rica captured one of the clearest images of a UFO to date. The film negatives have been re-scanned, and even higher-res photos derived from it were just released. https://www.uapmedia.uk/articles/costarica-ufo?format=amp
Quantum computers will be so powerful in the future that it will be possible to create accurate simulations of groups of individual atoms and their internal and external forces. This will lead to advances in battery design and materials science more generally as engineers will be able to rapidly experiment with all kinds of simulated alloys and element combinations to discover materials that have the optimal properties for different applications. https://www.discovermagazine.com/technology/how-quantum-simulations-are-set-to-revolutionize-lithium-batteries
In Madagascar, people of mainland African descent reproduced more than people of Indian Ocean rim descent because the former are more genetically resistant to malaria. Only in the central highlands, where mosquitoes are rarer, do non-Africans still predominate. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03342-5
More proof that human intelligence has a strong genetic component: Most of the world’s mathematicians fall into just 24 scientific ‘families’, one of which dates back to the fifteenth century. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2016.20491
Imagine this: the world is wracked by a mysterious disease that some claim the government deliberately created and released as part of a secret plan to expand its power. Infected people and even those suspected of being infected are forcibly quarantined and arrested. The police are the faceless enforcers of these rules, and wear high-tech helmets that thermographically scan passersby, and visually highlight people with high body temperatures on the police officer’s computerized visor. China has turned into a Deus Ex video game. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202004/biometric-face-scanning-helmets-reading-the-temperatures-of-people-in-crowds-in-china
Exposure to sarin nerve gas is probably what caused Gulf War Syndrome. It’s amazing how such faint contact with a substance can cause chronic illness and early death to so many people. The human body is frail. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-61398886
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has gone badly. In spite of Russia’s fearsome reputation and its recent military modernization, its battlefield performance has been disappointing and marred by many mistakes. The Ukrainians have fought harder than anyone anticipated, and have inflicted serious losses on their enemy. What was supposed to have been a quick, surgical operation to replace Ukraine’s regime with one friendlier to Moscow is turning into a bloody stalemate. Western sanctions against Russia for the invasion have been very severe, setting the country on course for major economic problems within a few months. It’s clear that Putin badly miscalculated when he decided to launch the war. Here’s a roundup of war articles:
On March 4, Russia scholar Michael Kofman predicted: “I try not to make too many predictions. I think given all the problems in the Russian campaign, delusional assumptions, an unworkable concept of operations, little prepared for a sustained war like this, I give it ~3 more weeks before this is an exhausted force.” https://twitter.com/KofmanMichael/status/1499967950975115269
This is a great analysis of Russia’s mistakes, and the likely future of the war. One basic insight is that the Russians were too weak to attack Ukraine on three fronts (northern, eastern, and southern) and achieve major objectives on all of them. They should have used all their forces to attack only one front. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/03/21/michael-kofman-russia-military-expert-00018906
It’s also prudent to remember that Russia has a much greater warmaking capacity than Ukraine. In the long run, and if it were willing to pay the price, Russia could take over its smaller neighbor. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60881915
Ukraine has captured at least one, seemingly intact example of the Russian Army’s most advanced field radio, the “R-187P1 Azart.” The Russians have far fewer Azarts than they claimed before the invasion, and are mostly relying on older radios and even cellphones, which can all be more easily jammed and eavesdropped on. And, in an example of the corruption that pervades Russia and has damaged its battlefield performance, there’s evidence that the Russian company in charge of making Azart radios secretly imported electronic components from China to make them, and pocketed the difference between what the Russian government paid them, and what they saved by using Chinese parts. https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/russian-comms-ukraine-world-hertz
‘The CIA director said Putin premised his war on four false assumptions: He thought Ukraine was weak, he believed Europe was distracted and wouldn’t mount a strong response, he thought Russia’s economy was prepared to withstand sanctions and he believed Russia’s military had been modernized and would fight effectively.’ https://www.npr.org/2022/03/08/1085155440/cia-director-putin-is-angry-and-frustrated-likely-to-double-down
Here’s a video of a Ukrainian infantry platoon going into battle armed with a variety of Western-supplied antitank missiles. These have caused major damage to Russia’s military vehicle fleet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gezu6A9zcLU
The Ukrainian soldiers who ambushed and destroyed a small column of Russian vehicles near Kiev give a detailed description of the battle, at the site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ryCBcq_qxk
Video of Ukrainian troops blowing up an abandoned Russian tank, presumably because of the chance that Russian forces might recapture the area and return the vehicle to service. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFhspNJEHIk
The U.S. government’s official stance is now that Russian forces have committed war crimes against the Ukrainian people, and the matter should be investigated by an international criminal court. https://www.state.gov/war-crimes-by-russias-forces-in-ukraine/
An interesting bit about NATO standards: ‘Finally, some national standards are recognized as not inferior to NATO standards and do not require revision (in Ukraine, for instance, these are those related to potable water quality). The fact that compliance with all NATO standards is not the norm even for leading states members is evidenced by the fact that no country of the Alliance has achieved the mark of 100%, although in some, including Germany (91%), Great Britain (83%), France, Norway (81% each), Canada (76%), the degree of the implementation of standards is very high…Let us assume that if the current pace of implementation is maintained, Ukraine will implement at least 90% of the existing standards of the Alliance in approximately 13–14 years.’ https://rpr.org.ua/en/news/ukraine-and-nato-standards-progress-under-zelenskyy-s-presidency/
Britain is planning on upgrading its tank fleet to indigenously made Challenger 3’s, but it’s not economical for them to keep such a small fleet of one-off tanks that are specific to their country. They should switch to either the U.S. M1 Abrams or German Leopard 2, and maybe sell their Challenger 2’s to smaller NATO countries, like the Balkan states. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/44927/british-armys-next-generation-challenger-3-tank-is-now-under-construction
The Soviet VVA-14 was one of the weirdest but potentially most versatile aircraft ever built. Its designer had plans for even more dramatic variants that weren’t built. https://youtu.be/UD7xiWWs-bs
NASA briefly experimented with “passive” communications satellites that were large balloons made out of radar-reflecting materials. One ground station would aim a powerful radio at it and broadcast a signal, which would bounce off the balloon and deflect at such an angle that another ground station thousands of miles distant would receive it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echo
Using CRISPR, scientists were able to self-fertilize a female mouse with her own eggs. One of the resulting 12 zygotes lived to adulthood. It was not a clone of her. A clone shares 100% of your DNA, and a natural child shares 50% of your DNA. This new technique could be used to make offspring that shared an unnatural amount of your DNA, like 75 or 85%. https://phys.org/news/2022-03-mammalian-offspring-derived-unfertilized-egg.html
My predictions about humans in 12,022 A.D.: -There might still be some Homo sapiens, though they will be genetically engineered. Imagine today’s all-star athlete who graduated from high school at 17, went to MIT on an academic scholarship, and is also a model on the side being the average human by then. We could breed with them. -There will be “human-looking” people that will have radically different genetics and anatomical/physiological features from us. Imagine a person who looks externally normal, but has bird lungs, octopus eyes, and a different number of chromosomes than you. They will be so different that they will count as different species, and we won’t be able to breed with them. -There will be intelligent but nonhuman-looking life forms that are the products of many iterations of genetic engineering. Imagine something like a horse-sized spider with a big brain occupying most of its torso. It could trace its lineage back to a normal human that is alive today. -Some members of those three groups of intelligent life forms will be meshed with technology that augments their abilities. There might be a Homo sapien with synthetic, self-healing organs that are superior to his old, natural organs, there might be a “human-looking” Homo neosapien that also has brain implants to make him smarter, and there might be intelligent spiders with nanomachines circulating in their bloodstreams to assist with various bodily processes.
‘[By 1,000 years from now] The bulk of technology will remain simple or semi-simple, while a smaller portion will continue to complexify greatly. I expect our cities and homes a thousand years hence to be recognizable, rather than unrecognizable. As long as we inhabit bodies approximately our size – a few meters and 50 kilos — the bulk of the technology that will surround us need not be crazily more complex. And there is good reason to expect we’ll remain the same size, despite intense genetic engineering and downloading to robots. Our body size is weirdly almost exactly in the middle of the size of the universe. The smallest things we know about are approximately 30 orders of magnitude smaller than ourselves, and the largest structures in the universe are about 30 orders of magnitude bigger. We inhabit a middle scale that is sympathetic to sustainable flexibility in the universe’s current physics. Bigger bodies encourage rigidity, smaller ones encourage empheralization. As long as we own bodies – and what sane being does not want to be embodied? – the infrastructure technology we already have will continue (in general) to work. Roads of stone, buildings of modified plant material and earth, not that different from our cities and homes 2,000 years ago. Some visionaries might imagine complex living buildings in the future, for instance, but most average structures are unlikely to be more complex than the formerly living plants we already use. They don’t need to. I think there is a “complex enough” restraint. Technologies need not complexify to be useful in the future. Danny Hillis, computer inventor, once confided to me that he believed that there’s a good chance that 1,000 years from now computers might still be running programming code from today, say a unix kernel and TCP/IP. They almost certainly will be binary digital. Like bacteria, or cockroaches, these simpler technologies remain simple, and remain viable, because they work. They don’t have to get more complex.’ https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-arc-of-comp/
What happens if you load an enormous amount of data on chemical reactions and human biology into an AI, and then task it with finding lethal compounds against us?
‘In less than 6 hours after starting on our in-house server, our model generated 40,000 molecules that scored within our desired threshold. In the process, the AI designed not only VX, but also many other known chemical warfare agents that we identified through visual confirmation with structures in public chemistry databases. Many new molecules were also designed that looked equally plausible. These new molecules were predicted to be more toxic, based on the predicted LD50 values, than publicly known chemical warfare agents.’ https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-022-00465-9
This analysis predicts that the U.S. trucking industry will probably switch to a “transfer-hub” model where autonomous trucks transport goods over long, simple highway routes, while human drivers in smaller trucks move the cargoes over shorter distances at both ends. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01103-w
Small doses of radiation might actually benefit human health thanks to a process called “hormesis.” Note that nuclear power is so expensive partly because the power plants aren’t allowed to release any radiation at all to the surrounding environment, and that requirement is predicated on the assumption that any amount of radiation exposure hurts people. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/832949v1
I agree that the fake meat industry has been overhyped. Though meat substitutes are cheaper and more convincing than ever, they will not render meat consumption extinct. Not even close. Lab-grown meats will eventually eliminate the need to kill animals for food, but the technology won’t be good enough until near the end of this century (it’s not as good or advancing as fast as its contemporary cheerleaders claim). https://reason.com/2022/03/05/the-fake-meat-revolution-has-stalled/
Computers have translated pig noises into a basic “vocabulary” of emotional and mental states. A variety of technologies will let us communicate with animals in the future, and possibly to even share thoughts with them. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-07174-8
North Korea still operates some Japanese-made trains from the 1930s. Thanks to the country’s socialist economy, labor is practically free, making it financially possible to keep fixing the trains in spite of their age. Once robots have made labor free across the world, will it become common for manufactured objects of all kinds to stay in service much longer than they do now? https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2021/07/blast-from-past-north-koreas-whacky.html
The German gunboat Graf von Goetzen was launched in 1915 and sent to Tanzania (then a German colony) to dominate Lake Tanganyika. Though the Germans left, the ship didn’t, and it remains in service to this day as a ferry, renamed the Liemba. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Liemba
There’s a new scientific paper claiming that ivermectin doesn’t treat COVID-19. Instead, it kills parasitic worms in people, boosting their immune systems just enough to let them survive COVID-19. Parasites are only common in tropical areas. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3079
The pandemic isn’t over: China just locked down one of its biggest and most important cities due to a surge in COVID-19 cases. It will have global economic consequences. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-60893070
A few years ago, I did a thought exercise where I deduced what a robot tank would be like. I concluded that the lack of human crewmen would allow such a tank to be shorter, lighter, and less voluminous than manned tanks, but that it would still look unmistakably “tank-like” and would be in the size range of current tanks. Thus, the future of armored warfare will look much the same as its present, even if a lot of new technology will be hidden under the hood.
Now I wonder if this would be the case for warships. Given their great variety, I have to restrict my analysis to just one type, the aircraft carrier, but my key conclusions can probably apply to the rest. And since there are many types of aircraft carriers, I’m focusing this analysis on supercarriers in particular, which only the U.S. Navy has at present. The newest American supercarrier that is also fully mission-capable is the U.S.S. George H.W. Bush, and as such, it’s fair to call it America’s “best” aircraft carrier. So what would a robot George Bush look like?
The USS George H.W. Bush
First, the ship’s gross architecture would stay the same. It would need an oblong hull with a pointed front to minimize hydrodynamic drag. The top would need to be flat and uncluttered so planes could land on and take off from it. Even in the far future, most planes will still take off and land the traditional way on runways. Even with more advanced aircraft technology, fighter planes won’t hover straight up into the air to take off. Vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) will, thanks to physics and the usefulness of “lift,” always be a MUCH less fuel-efficient way to get airborne and then return to the ground than speeding down a runway. Every extra pound that a VTOL plane needs to land and take off is one pound it doesn’t have for weapons.
The George H.W. Bush’s island structure.
In fact, the only external difference between the U.S.S. George H.W. Bush and its robot equivalent would be the ships’ islands. On an aircraft carrier, the “island” is a vertical protrusion on the otherwise-flat flight deck, and it somewhat resembles a small office building. It provides mounting points for radars, radios, and other sensors, and also contains the bridge, flight control room, and smaller rooms for specialized tasks.
These photos show the bridge of one of the Bush’s sister ships.
The captain and his command crew are in the bridge, where they monitor and control overall ship operations. The flight control room is one level above that, and is where other officers coordinate aircraft movements on and off the carrier. It’s obvious why these crewmen need to be situated in a high place where they have good views of the ship’s flight deck and the surrounding waters. In turn, the physical sizes of human bodies and our need for clearance space to walk around each other dictate the dimensions of those rooms, and ultimately, the shape and size of the island. Thus, this part of an aircraft carrier is designed around the human form.
On an automated aircraft carrier, such considerations could be dispensed with since humans wouldn’t be aboard. Visual monitoring of the flight deck and seas could be done with cameras, allowing the bridge, flight control room, and other small rooms in the island that support their functions to be deleted (computers located deep inside the ship’s hull would watch the video feeds). As a result, the office-building-like island would be thinned down to a mast. It might be of a metal lattice design, or could be solid with a geometrically faceted exterior to reduce the ship’s radar signature.
A British frigate with three masts of two different designs. The one at left is geometric, while the two at right are simple metal lattice towers. A robot aircraft carrier’s island would look like one of these.
A thinner island would help a robot aircraft carrier by increasing its flight deck area and reducing the air turbulence over it. The ship’s survivability would also be improved since its command staff wouldn’t be kept in an exposed, vulnerable location. Instead, it’s command functions would be done by a central computer located in an armored room below decks.
A Nimitz-class carrier like the George H.W. Bush typically contains 56 planes (mostly fighters like the F/A-18) and 15 helicopters. Our robot version of the carrier would have autonomous versions of those aircraft. Since the planes lack human pilots and crewmen, things like ejection seats, steering controls, bubble canopies, computer screens, and oxygen pumps could be deleted, reducing gross weight. That weight savings would let the aircraft take off and land a little more easily, possibly reducing the lengths of runway they needed, and hence reducing the overall length of the ship.
However, any such benefit would be tiny since the weight of the pilot and his supporting equipment is relatively minuscule. For example, an F/A-18 Super Hornet that is fully fueled and armed for a combat mission could weigh over 50,000 lbs, less than 1,000 lbs of which is represented by the pilot and his aforementioned support gear. An unmanned F/A-18 might be able to take off and land on a runway a few feet shorter than the manned version, but that’s it. Therefore, the lengths of the runways used for takeoffs and landings on the robot carrier would either be the same as those on the human-crewed counterpart, or imperceptibly shorter.
The reduction of the island’s mass might result in the flight deck being slightly narrower since the port side of the deck wouldn’t need to flare out as much to counterbalance the weight of the starboard side.
A careful look at this head-on view of the George H.W. Bush reveals that the port side of the ship (right side in this photo) juts out farther from the ship’s centerline than the starboard side (left side in the photo). This asymmetry exists to balance out the island’s weight.
The robot ship’s “freeboard,” which refers to the vertical distance between the surface of the water and the top of its flight deck, would be the same or very close to the manned version’s, which is 57 feet. In general, as ships get longer and heaver, they need higher freeboards to keep stable. A high freeboard is also very important for ships meant to sail through rough seas, which an aircraft carrier would need to do since wars don’t pause for bad weather anymore. There’s no reason to think the manned USS George H.W. Bush’s freeboard is not optimal given the ship’s size and function, nor is there evidence that the crew’s uniquely human needs affected the freeboard.
The USS Midway appears to sit lower in the water than the USS George H.W. Bush
The argument for this optimality is strengthened by the example of the USS Midway, another aircraft carrier that served the U.S. Navy from 1945 to 1992. In the 1960s, it went through a major renovation in which the flight deck was widened to accommodate the bigger planes that were entering service, which added substantial weight to the ship and made it sit lower in the water. The reduced freeboard hurt the Midway‘s performance in rough seas, and the ship also had more problems with waves splashing into the ship’s open side elevators, and even splashing over the bow to soak the flight deck. The problems kept it from conducting flights in sea conditions that the George H.W. Bush could still operate in. The contrast between the ships further supports the conclusion that the Bush’s freeboard is already optimized, and wouldn’t be different or would only be a tiny amount different in an autonomous version of the ship.
To summarize this analysis of the robot carrier’s exterior, it might have have a slightly different profile and slightly different dimensions to its flight deck compared to the manned version. However, this would be very hard to see, and by far, the most visible difference would be to the island.
The ship’s interior layout is the most subject to human needs since it is where almost 6,000 people work and live, 24 hours a day, for months on end. Before moving on to that half of this analysis, it’s important to point out that an autonomous aircraft carrier would still need crewmen, though they’d be robotic. They would need to be able to move around the ship for inspections, maintenance, repairs, emergency response, and to transport things. Therefore, the inside of the robotic George H.W. Bush would still be comprised of rooms, doors, stairways, and passageways to enable the crew to access every part of the ship.
To understand how the ship’s interior layout would change if human-centric design concerns were abandoned, first study these cutaway illustrations of the George H.W. Bush’s class of ships:
A simplified cross-section of the USS George H.W. Bush.
The USS Nimitz is one of the USS George H.W. Bush’s sister ships.
A side view of the USS Ronald Reagan’s interior, another of the Bush’s sister ships. A larger version that you can zoom in on is at the image creator’s website: http://patrickturner.com/carrier.html
A cutaway showing the size and location of the USS Ronald Reagan’s hangar deck.
Let’s start by distinguishing the features and sections of the ship that exist because of the presence of humans, or are larger than they need to be because of human physiology, from the features and sections that do not. The hangar is massive and is necessary to house the carrier’s aircraft for maintenance, repairs and modifications. It’s size is dictated by the sizes of the planes and by the need to have enough space around each one to be able to move them around and provide crew with access to them. There’s no reason to assume the size or layout of the hangar deck would be different if the carrier were autonomous, so the largest single room in the ship would be the same.
This is also true for the series of large rooms at the ship’s lowest point, called “the fourth deck,” which contain its nuclear reactors, electrical generators and gearing that connects the engines to the propellers. Smaller rooms on the fourth deck that store jet fuel, munitions for the planes, and water for the steam catapults are also not designed around human needs. (They are stored at the lowest part of the ship to keep its center of gravity low, improving its stability.)
It’s impossible to generalize about all the other decks of the ship since rooms dedicated to purely mechanical functions (e.g. – jet engine repair shop, steam catapult piping spaces) are mixed in with those dedicated to human crew needs (e.g. – bunk rooms, hospital, cafeteria). All we can say is those of the former category would stay, while the latter would disappear, leaving a lot of empty space.
The robot crewmen wouldn’t need to eat, sleep, party, or satisfy hygienic needs, and would probably stay at their work stations almost all the time. The only room dedicated to their unique needs might be a specialized repair shop and spare parts room. Those rooms would take vastly less space than the bunk rooms, bathrooms, cafeterias, bakeries, laundromats, conference rooms, etc. that would need to be there to satisfy a human crew’s needs.
The ability to work constantly would also allow a robot crew to be smaller than a human one without reducing work output. Assuming an average sailor works a 12-hour day and works as efficiently as a robot when he’s on duty, 3,000 robots could to the work of 6,000 humans. The disparity might actually turn out to be more extreme.
Getting rid of the human crew wouldn’t just save internal space–it would save weight. The clothing, beddings, beds, furniture, cooking appliances, laundry machines, bathroom fixtures, lockers, food, and water (in excess of what is needed for the steam catapults), plus the plumbing and electrical/data cables needed to support some of those features add up, and if the humans disappeared, so would all of those things. Ironically, a robotic aircraft carrier would also have fewer computers and display monitors in it since the machines wouldn’t need them because they’d be able to directly interface their minds with the ship’s sensors and main computer. Lessening the number of devices would also save weight.
Moreover, the need to divide a ship’s internal space into rooms that only exist due to human needs, like walling off an area to create privacy for a bathroom, adds weight since the walls themselves are heavy. If the ship weren’t designed around human needs, more parts of the ship could be large, open areas, cutting overall weight.
With these considerations in mind, a low estimate for the amount of weight saved by eliminating the human crew is one ton (2,000 lbs) per person. The total weight savings is therefore 6,000 tons, which is a small but still helpful boost for a vessel displacing 114,000 tons.
Our robotic version of the George H.W. Bush could deal with its excess internal volume and weight savings in a three different ways. The simplest option would be to just accept having more empty space inside of itself, and to capitalize on the slight increase in sailing speed and ship energy efficiency that would owe to being lighter. The ship would have the same number of decks and the same internal volume and the manned version, but the rooms would be larger, there would be less of them, and they would be less full of stuff. This option would let the carrier be more mission flexible since it could double as a transport.
The Nimitz-class USS Theodore Roosevelt undergoing replenishment at sea. Note the temporary cables connecting the ships, which are used to move supplies.
The second option would be to fill the robot George H.W. Bush‘s newly empty spaces with 6,000 tons of other stuff to improve its performance in some way. Nimitz-class aircraft carriers are powered by nuclear reactors whose uranium lasts for 20 years, so it wouldn’t help to add spare uranium rods to the ship (refueling is done in port for the sake of safety, anyway). However, other types of essential supplies are depleted over the course of a multi-month cruise, forcing a carrier to halt operations so it can pull alongside a cargo ship for a tedious resupply process called “replenishment.”
The lack of human crewmen would mean the carrier would no longer need food replenishments, but it would still need replenishments of aviation fuel, munitions, and spare parts for its aircraft and itself. Given that a Nimitz-class ship’s 8,500 ton supply of aviation fuel , called “JP-5,” only last about seven days during routine operations, and even less during round-the-clock combat operations, the robot version of the ship would derive the most benefit from adding more fuel tanks.
If the capacity of the robot George H.W. Bush’s aviation fuel storage tanks increase from 8,500 to 14,500 tons, if JP-5 is 6.8 pounds per U.S. gallon, and if a gallon of liquid is 0.134 cubic feet, then we can calculate how much volume the added 6,000 tons of fuel will take up inside the ship.
Glimpsing at this cross-section of the George H.W. Bush again, we see that aviation fuel in stored in long tanks stretching along the port and starboard sides of the ship (item #8 in the image). At the waterline, the ship is 1,092 feet long, and the draught (the distance between the waterline and the bottom of the ship’s hull) is 37 feet. So if we add 236,470 cubic feet of fuel tanks to the existing tanks indicated in the illustration…
1,092 feet x 37 feet = 40,404 square feet on port side and starboard side (80,808 total) 236,470 cubic feet / 80,808 square feet = 2.9 feet
…then we could fit in the extra fuel by widening the existing storage areas by a mere 2.9 feet. As a result, in the above illustration, item #8 would be very slightly wider on both sides of the ship, and item #10 would be very slightly narrower by the same amount. Adding 6,000 tons of aviation fuel is very doable.
The result would be a ship that weighed and handled the same as its manned counterpart, but could launch airstrikes against enemies for longer periods of time before having to pause to get a gas refill from another ship. The robot carrier’s upper decks would have a lot more empty space than the manned version, but it wouldn’t be able to fill it up without slowing itself down.
The third option would be to get rid of the surplus human spaces by deleting some of the ship’s decks, in turn reducing the carrier’s total interior volume. The mission-essential rooms that remained, like the repair shops and spare parts storage rooms, would then be reconfigured so they filled up the ship’s interior efficiently, with no empty spaces or oversized rooms. If you could explore this robot George H.W. Bush version, it would seem as claustrophobic as its manned counterpart, though it would take less time to tour the latter since it would have one or two fewer decks.
This modification would cut even more weight from the vessel, allowing it to travel faster with the same nuclear reactors, or to travel at the same speed with smaller reactors. The reduced mass would also make it faster and cheaper to build.
“Freeboard” is the vertical distance between the water’s surface and the top of a ship’s hull, and “draught” is the vertical distance between the bottom of a ship’s hull and the water’s surface.
But this design change raises a potential problem: If we reduce the number of decks in the ship, then we reduce its overall height from the bottom to top. As discussed earlier in this analysis, we can’t reduce the freeboard because that’s already optimized. That means we have to reduce the “draught” (also called “draft”), which is the vertical distance from the bottom of the ship’s hull to the water’s surface. However, reducing the draught too much can make a ship unstable.
The George H.W. Bush‘s draught is 37 feet. If one deck were deleted, the draught would be 28.5 feet, and the ship’s weight would also decrease. Let’s say it drops from 114,000 tons to 100,000. Would the ship still be stable? Maybe. After all, there are several cruise ships whose dimensions with nearly identical dimensions, and they’re very seaworthy:
Ship name
Tonnage
Draught (ft)
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
USS George H.W. Bush (manned)
114,000
37
1,040
134
USS George H.W. Bush (robot) minus one deck
100,000
28.5
1,040
134
Carnival Sunshine
103,881
26.25
892
125
Costa Fortuna
102,587
27.23
892
125
MSC Orchestra
92,409
25.75
964
105
Norwegian Pearl
93,530
28.3
964
105
The cruise ships with draughts of 25.75 – 28.3 feet can handle rough seas, so the table suggests our robot aircraft carrier would presumably be able to do so just as well with a draught of 28.5 feet. However, it’s possible the demands placed on a ship designed for war are different from those of a ship designed for recreation, making a 28.5 foot draught insufficient for an aircraft carrier. A warship probably needs to be able to accelerate harder, make tighter turns, and endure worse weather conditions than a cruise liner. Unlike my research on the freeboard, I wasn’t able to find data on the optimal draught for a carrier, so I can’t answer the question, I can only conclude that a robotic aircraft carrier might have fewer decks and less internal volume than a manned counterpart.
In conclusion, while a robot version of the U.S.S George H.W. Bush wouldn’t look much different from a manned version on the outside, there would be substantial differences on the inside. All of the rooms and items that existed to service the needs of the human crew (bunk rooms, bathroom, cafeterias, offices, furniture, display monitors, etc.) would be missing. If the robot version retained the same amount of internal space as the manned version, then it would feel much emptier and more open inside. Its performance would also be superior to the manned version in one or more areas (e.g. – faster, more fuel for planes, better mission flexibility thanks to more storage space). If the robot version were designed to exclude excess volume, then it would feel about as constricted as the manned version, and it’s interior would be smaller, making it faster to do a full walking tour of the ship. A less capacious version of the USS George H.W. Bush may or may not have better performance in one or more areas than its manned counterpart, but for sure, it would be faster and cheaper to manufacture, allowing a country to make more ships for the same amount of money.
Finally, another observed difference would be lower levels of activity on an autonomous aircraft carrier since there would be far fewer crewmen. Moreover, since the crew would all be robots, they wouldn’t need to roam the ship to visit bathrooms, the cafeteria, buddies, or their bunks–they would stay put at their duty locations almost all the time. For example, a robot that fixed airplane engines would spend all its time in the engine repair shop. If it needed power, it would plug itself into a wall outlet in that room. It might only ever leave the room to visit the robot repair shop when it broke.
The robots would be of different sizes and designs to suit different roles on the ship. Obviously, they would need to be waterproof and capable of working normally underwater, to some reasonable depth and pressure level (100 – 200 meters). Unlike human crewmen, if the carrier were sinking, they would stay inside and focus on fixing the vessel, reducing the odds of it being lost. They could even keep working in parts of the ship that had filled with water.
Contrast that scenario with the premature abandonment of the U.S.S. Yorktown in WWII, which happened because the captain erroneously assumed the ship was doomed, and the human crewmen were afraid to risk their lives by remaining on it. The central computer of a robot George H.W. Bush would not make such a mistake, and its robot crew would unfailing execute its orders until the end, even in the worst of circumstances.
On the second anniversary of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani’s assassination by a U.S. drone strike, two Iranian drones attacked an American military base in Baghdad. Both were shot down by a U.S. antiaircraft system called “C-RAM.” A C-RAM unit has a built-in radar that identifies the locations and flight paths of enemy aircraft and missiles, and it uses the data to aim its heavy machine gun so the bullets intercept them. All the human operator has to do is push a button to allow the C-RAM to fire. At the 0:26 mark in the video, the C-RAM opened fire on one of the Iranian drones. Note the laser-like stream of bullets. The machine’s aim was perfect. https://youtu.be/Ajkg8yfgug0
Contrast that with footage of human-aimed antiaircraft guns trying to shoot down Japanese kamikaze planes in WWII. You’ll see dozens of machine guns spewing out thousands of bullets at one plane, and missing–often being wildly off-target. https://youtu.be/4mTECUWP0Hk?t=171
At the same time, GPT-3 is a much better chatbot than the best of ten years ago. I think each iteration of GPT will make fewer conversational mistakes than the last, until some future version (GPT-6?) is finally “good enough” to pass the Turing Test. http://lacker.io/ai/2020/07/06/giving-gpt-3-a-turing-test.html
Once “Metaverse” technology is mature and widespread, it will be common for sports fans to “hang out” in the bleachers of sports arenas during games. They could even pay for retired athletes and other popular commentators to sit with them in VR and narrate the games. Other fans will still be willing to buy tickets to sit in the real bleachers and attend the games in-person. https://futuristspeaker.com/business-trends/when-nfl-football-moves-into-the-metaverse/
Machines can now convert a series of still photos of a building or place into a hi-res, 3D mock-up. Eventually, there will be a hyper-realistic, 1:1 virtual version of the real world that people will be able to explore in VR. https://youtu.be/yptwRRpPEBM
“Frequency hopping” is a method of sending encrypted messages with radio signals. A message like a simple sentence is chopped up into bits, each of which is transmitted on a different frequency from the other. To anyone listening to just one radio wavelength, they will only hear a single, brief sound of the message. However, the intended recipient will hear the whole thing thanks to a special radio descrambler that knows how the bits are distributed across the frequency spectrum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_spectrum
Dial-up modems from 20+ years ago used sounds to send and receive data. This is why, if you established the connection and then picked up the phone, you’d hear loud static for a moment–the static was the digital data being conveyed as sounds. Telephone lines weren’t built with the future needs of the internet in mind–they were designed around the much less demanding needs of human speech and listening. As a result, they can’t handle more than 56 kilobytes of data transfer. https://www.10stripe.com/articles/why-is-56k-the-fastest-dialup-modem-speed.php
In 1991, George Friedman published a book predicting the U.S. and Japan would fight a war by 2020. This is something to remember when thinking about his other geopolitical predictions, which also look likely to fail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrbUX84LcXg
Six months ago, Peter Zeihan predicted “We are gonna have inflation in the last half of this year that is absolutely going to be higher than what we had in the early 80s [and] probably faster than what we had in the 70s.” He was basically right. The U.S. inflation rate for November was the highest since July 1982. https://youtu.be/x_fpY63fcd8?t=3560
Nuclear-powered civilian ships were introduced before the technology was fully ready, and were doomed by irrational public fears about radiation and by unfair press coverage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYj4F_cyiJI
Theoretically, we could also build antennas that used the planet’s radiation of excess heat into space to generate electricity. https://www.pnas.org/content/111/11/3927
Theoretically, 10 quadrillion people could live on Earth. We’d just have to build 300,000-storey high skyscrapers to fit everyone, plus a bunch of other megaprojects to radiate the planet’s excess heat into space and regulate global sunlight levels. https://hereticalupdate.substack.com/p/is-earth-running-out-of-resources
‘The result is that you see a distinct parabolic shape in the returns on investment for a tall building. The point of maximum return varies depending on the city, the type of construction and the location of building, and real estate professionals go to great effort to determine the economic building height for a given case. For an office building on a piece of valuable urban real estate, this has traditionally been considered to be in the neighborhood of 60 to 70 storeys tall. During planning for the Empire State Building, it was calculated that 75 storeys was the optimal height, and developers suggested that 70 storeys should be the maximum during the planning of One World Trade Center. But the existence of an increasing number of Manhattan supertall residential buildings suggests that this limit might be increasing, at least for luxury residential real estate.
Building height in excess of this “theoretical optimum” is often height for height’s sake, with the idea that an exceptionally tall building will have “prestige value” that more than compensates for the less efficient design. The (real or perceived) benefits of prestige, combined with the rising costs of servicing the upper floors, often results in buildings that achieve their height by adding large volumes of unoccupied space at the top. The Burj Khalifa, currently the tallest building, is perhaps the ultimate example of this, with the top 29% of the building being unoccupied space.’ https://www.worksinprogress.co/issue/why-skyscrapers-are-so-short/
Imagine a 1 – 10 rating scale for your full possible range of emotional experiences.
1 = Most miserable and painful you can be 5 = Feel neither good nor bad 10 = Most happy and blissful you can be
People intuitively think that the increments between each number are subjectively constant, so the felt difference between levels 9 and 10 is the same as the difference between levels 5 and 6. However, there’s evidence that the good and bad extremes are way, way, way more extreme, so that going from level 9 to level 10 is much more of a jump in subjective pleasure than going from level 5 to 6 is. https://www.qualiaresearchinstitute.org/blog/log-scales
With training, most people can learn to control single neurons in their brains. In the far future, I think humans will be able to control their own thoughts, emotions, and gene expression, just by thinking about it. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.05.079038v1.full
For the first time, a pig heart has been transplanted into a human without killing the person. The pig had been genetically engineered so its heart cells would be similar enough to human tissue to not be rejected by the human immune system. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59944889
This article was published in June 2020, a few months into the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, it was unclear what the effect on birthrates would be, and it could have been argued that more children that normal were going to be conceived since couples would have more time at their homes together. The article predicted the 2021 U.S. birthrate would be 300,000 – 500,000 lower than it was in 2020. The data are still coming in, but there was a decline, closer towards the lower end of their estimate. https://www.brookings.edu/research/half-a-million-fewer-children-the-coming-covid-baby-bust/
