Interesting articles, May 2020

The Philippines Presidential Security Group

The Philippines “Presidential Security Group” has the most interesting camouflage uniforms I’ve seen. As wacky as it looks, it actually adheres to the best principles of military camouflage (coarse pixelation, use of parallel and perpendicular lines and hard angles instead of wavy lines). If you changed the color scheme to black with earth-toned green and brown, it would probably do an excellent job concealing you in vegetated areas from people looking at you from typical combat distances (50 meters and above).
https://youtu.be/ZpsXwolf0Oo

A very bold and recent prediction that didn’t fare well.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8277471/North-Korean-defector-says-99-sure-Kim-Jong-dead.html

The Kennedy administration considered building a nuclear bunker 3,500 feet under the Pentagon that could survive 200 megaton surface detonations. The biggest nuclear weapon ever built was ONLY 50 megatons.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/33003/the-pentagons-plan-to-build-a-secret-super-command-bunker-3500-feet-under-washington-d-c

During WWII, the British aircraft carriers had 3 inch-thick armor plates right under their flight decks, and also armored walls around the hangars right below that. Because of this, they could carry fewer planes than the un-armored American carriers, but they were also more durable. Several British aircraft carriers probably would have sunk had it not been for their armored decks.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/were-royal-navys-armored-aircraft-carrier-decks-worth-it-152081

After the U.S. had to dock its two Pacific aircraft carriers due to epidemics of COVID-19 among their crews, China sent its own aircraft carrier battle group out, alarming Taiwan.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3079546/taiwan-scrambles-warships-pla-navy-aircraft-carrier-strike

A new analysis about China’s growing naval strength reveals that they could achieve numerical superiority over the U.S. Navy in a conflict in the Western Pacific.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33153.pdf

One of China’s army training bases has a full-size replica of Taiwan’s Presidential Building.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/33591/chinas-biggest-base-has-huge-replicas-of-taiwans-presidential-building-and-the-eiffel-tower

Francis Fukuyama thinks that Xi Jinping has made China less free than it was 10 years ago, and that the U.S. should now treat it as an enemy with global ambitions.
https://www.the-american-interest.com/2020/05/18/what-kind-of-regime-does-china-have/

You know you’re broke when your best tank is a T-34, and you shoot it by standing outside and pulling on a long rope tied to the trigger because you’re afraid it might blow up.
https://youtu.be/eMMCYWxAtco

This thermal camera video of a Russian tank parade show that much of a tank’s heat signature comes from its wheels and tracks. As the tank drive around, those metal parts rub against each other, producing heat through friction. I don’t see how this can be ameliorated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6RZ9l_Fw4U

As warfare gets more advanced and sensor/communication-dependent, the size and prominence of each field unit’s “electronic emission signature” grows.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/33401/this-is-what-ground-forces-look-like-to-an-electronic-warfare-system-and-why-its-a-big-deal

Ukraine’s military lost half of its aircraft in the first year of war with Russia. While many were destroyed in combat or were captured, some were deleted from the official inventory because they were found to be nonfunctional due to years of neglect when Ukraine desperately tried to activate its whole arsenal.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-russia-nearly-wiped-out-ukrainian-air-force-141857

The U.S. Army is working on small, flying surveillance drones that infantrymen can send airborne using standard 40mm grenade launchers.
https://www.army.mil/article/234300/grenade_launchers_able_to_fire_armys_new_camera_drones

Boko Haram attacked and defeated a garrison of Chadian soldiers, killing almost 100 of them and capturing their weapons. This is the deadliest terrorist attack in that country.
https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/chad/derriere-lattaque-jihadiste-au-tchad

Russia has sent fighter planes and ground units of its private military contractors to fight for the rebels in Libya’s ongoing civil war. Turkey supports the embattled central government and sent troops to help earlier this year. Syria is of course another battleground between Russian and Turkey proxies.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/russian-camouflaged-fighter-jets-deployed-to-libya-to-back-rebel-air

A large Venezuelan navy patrol ship tried to capture a German cruise ship in the Caribbean. The warship rammed it, not realizing that the other ship had a reinforced hull for breaking through ice, and damaged itself so badly that it sank. The cruise ship had minimal damage.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8189463/Moment-Venezuelan-warship-RAMS-German-liner-Caribbean-sinks.html

A Mickey Mouse plot to take over Venezuela, and involving at least two military contractors from the U.S., failed. It was so amateurish that it’s doubtful the U.S. government ordered it to proceed.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/33322/breaking-down-the-absolutely-batshit-botched-coup-attempt-against-venezuelas-maduro

The Apollo 13 near-disaster mission happened 50 years ago. Videos that the crewmen filmed have been used to make new, hi-res still photos through a process that compared the images from multiple frames of video film that showed the same scene (a video camera from that era shot 24 frames per second). It’s similar to the single-pixel camera I linked to in a past blog entry.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52264743
http://news.mit.edu/2017/faster-single-pixel-camera-lensless-imaging-0330

The explosion that caused the Apollo 13 crisis resulted from an incredible series of small malfunctions. Also, had the explosion happened a few hours before or after it actually did, the crewmen would have all died.
https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-checklist-of-what-had-to-go-wrong-for-apollo-13-to-1697567898

“Fata morgana” is a rare atmospheric phenomenon that doubtless explains many UFO sightings.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a32389233/optical-illuson-fata-morgana-ufo-flying-ship/

This video explains why exotic forms of communication, like using only smells, touch, or gravity waves, are impractical and grossly inferior to the forms of communication we use (speech, looking at writing, radio signals). Also, it makes the point that aliens could learn human languages by listening to our radio broadcasts and finding simple patterns, like the fact that the word “breakfast” is mentioned most often in the mornings, and is usually associated with words relating to food and hunger. They could learn our languages, at least to an elementary degree, without interacting with us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thdC-HlRHWg

This video provides a good overview of radar jamming. Radar is of course used to detect the locations of planes and ships. A radar station does this by sending out beams of radio waves, and then waiting to see if any of those waves bounce off a solid object and are reflected back to the station. The radar’s computer compiles any such echoes into a visual representation of the planes and ships, which looks like the familiar, circular computer screen image of little white dots against a black background. A human sits at a chair watching this screen. To jam a radar, you point a radio emitter of your own at the radar station and shoot powerful radio beams at it. The radar station’s receiver is overloaded, and the circular screen displays static, or goes 100% white. It’s conceptually the same as blinding a human by shining a very bright flashlight in his eyes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su44ZU7NcQU

Air radar coverage map

Large parts of America’s airspace are not monitored by aircraft radars.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/07/22/u-s-radars-have-come-a-long-way-but-gaps-in-coverage-remain-big-a-risk/

Before radar was developed, militaries would use “acoustic mirrors” to listen for the approach of enemy planes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_mirror

“Artillery sound ranging” is a technique in which the location of a piece of enemy artillery is triangulated by measuring the time delay between when the blast of its discharge is heard at different locations. This can also be used to find sources of small arms fire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artillery_sound_ranging

An American private military company has bought Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu’s personal Boeing 707 and plans to turn it into an aerial refueling plane.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/32962/romanian-dictators-boeing-707-makes-first-flight-in-years-for-delivery-to-air-refueling-firm

The article doesn’t make the case that the 737 Max’ computer hardware was the problem. Flying a plane is complicated, but there are only so many variables your computer needs to keep track of, and a 20-year-old processor design might be fully adequate (by the same token, a Godlike supercomputer would not be better at tic-tac-toe than a teenager). Rather, a particular software algorithm installed in the 737 Max planes was the real defect.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/9/21197162/boeing-737-max-software-hardware-computer-fcc-crash

The “Baltimore Stockbroker Scam” is kind of ingenious. It touches on a point I made about good futurism: ‘You can be right thanks to luck alone, and “a stopped clock is right twice a day.”’
http://livingstingy.blogspot.com/2020/05/how-to-predict-future-simply-predict.html

The Apple Watch is five years old.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apple_Watch&oldid=956160178

The average human’s brain size has significantly shrunk over the last 20,000 years. Have we gotten dumber as a result? Maybe.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/if-modern-humans-are-so-smart-why-are-our-brains-shrinking

Most of the fruit fly’s brain has been mapped. It’s a step forward, though it should be remembered that a human brain has 600,000 times as many neurons. Mapping the brains of progressively larger, smarter animals will be a long pathway to building AI.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.07.030213v1

Another small step towards building an AGI: “With Agent57, we have succeeded in building a more generally intelligent agent that has above-human performance on all tasks in the Atari57 benchmark.”
https://deepmind.com/blog/article/Agent57-Outperforming-the-human-Atari-benchmark

The rise of AI will revolutionize warfare because it will let countries build arbitrarily large numbers of combat robots. The size of a country’s military will no longer be limited by the size of its human population. Conventional warfare will become as big a threat to humanity’s existence as nuclear war is now.
“We envision fleets of smaller, multi-mission vessels, operating with surface warfare leadership. People talk about a 355-ship Navy, how about a 35,000-ship Navy?,” Maj. Gen. David Coffman…[he] explained it as a “family of combatant craft, manned and unmanned, integrated in a distributed maritime operation.”
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/autonomous-navy-ships-could-revolutionize-amphibious-assault-156481

It will be interesting to see the prototype ship designs that result from this.
‘NOMARS will challenge the traditional naval architecture paradigm, designing a seaframe from the ground up with no provision, allowance, or expectation for humans at sea. By removing the human element from all ship design considerations, NOMARS will demonstrate significant advantages, to include size, cost (procurement, operations, and sustainment), at-sea reliability, survivability to sea-state, survivability to adversary actions (stealth considerations, resistance to tampering, etc.), and hydrodynamic efficiency (hull optimization without consideration for crew safety or comfort).’
https://beta.sam.gov/opp/fd0ba75d1ef64d569db637571f659dbb/view

The examples of the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors might offer insights into how AGIs could take over the world. Machines could play different human groups against each other, and then turn on their allies at the end.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ivpKSjM4D6FbqF4pZ/cortes-pizarro-and-afonso-as-precedents-for-takeover

This interesting exploration of “slack” underscores why species and civilizations are more successful if they all for some diversity, even if that diversity makes them slightly sub-optimal most of the time. This is part of why I doubt intelligent machines will eradicate the human race.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/05/12/studies-on-slack/

I like it when a distinguished but elderly scientist (Dr. Martin Rees) states that we’re going to evolve into genetically engineered cyborgs, some of whom will live on Mars.
https://youtu.be/A1dfjX0STEk

Ben Goertzel offers good challenges to the notion that suffering and death give meaning to human life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LbGwcDOmiQ

The citizens of the U.S. and Canada would get richer if their countries fully merged. Even with a “free trade agreement,” there’s a lot of potential cross-border trade that isn’t happening, costing everyone money. A fully unified internal market would solve that.
“Borders and Growth” https://www.nber.org/papers/w9223.pdf
“Gravity with Gravitas” https://www.nber.org/papers/w8079.pdf
“National Borders Matter” https://online.fliphtml5.com/tcva/smhp/#p=2

Here’s an interesting list of everyday things that have improved for Americans since the 1990s.
https://www.gwern.net/Improvements

The process of innovation and invention is a team effort full of trial-and-error, failed experiments, and small modifications to existing ideas and things. It can also be slowed or quashed by something as mundane as government red tape.
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/innovation-can-be-quashed/

The ACLU is suing “Clearview AI,” for violating the privacy rights of some Americans by compiling a searchable, massive trove of face photographs taken from publicly available internet sites.
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-sues-clearview-ai

If manmade impermeable surfaces (e.g. – roads, roofs, parking lots, sidewalks) increase by 1%, then the frequency of floods grows by 3.3%. What fraction of today’s flooding is caused by this and not by global warming?
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL086480

Global warming will make snowstorms less frequent and less severe in the U.S.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/26/climate-change-reduce-big-winter-snowstorms-study/5258663002/

The cost of solar power has dropped faster than any credible person predicted, even ten years ago. This supports my prediction that the 2020s will be the decade when better, cheaper solar panels and grid storage batteries will make solar power cost-competitive with standard forms of energy, even without government subsidies.
https://rameznaam.com/2020/05/14/solars-future-is-insanely-cheap-2020/

A big problem with solar and wind power is intermittency. To compensate for their sudden swings in electrical output over the course of the day, the people in charge of the electric grids have to throttle other power plants up and down. Natural gas power plants are best suited for this, but quickly dialing them up and down still greatly reduces their efficiency, releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere than they otherwise would. (We REALLY need to invent better batteries for grid energy storage.)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2019/03/11/what-happens-when-we-put-renewables-on-the-grid-to-green-our-electric-cars-is-really-complicated/#53b195e57022

There are genetic differences between northern and southern Italians.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8348963/First-study-Italians-genetic-diversity-reveals-dates-19-000-years-ago.html

A graduate math student just solved the 50-year-old “Conway Knot Problem.”
https://www.quantamagazine.org/graduate-student-solves-decades-old-conway-knot-problem-20200519/

Just as the air gets thinner as you go up a mountain, it gets thicker as you go down into a mine.
https://www.saimm.co.za/Journal/v105n06p387.pdf

Here’s a video of 300 Amish men picking up a barn and moving it across a field with their bare hands. When robots become cheap and widespread, we’ll be able to use them to do things like this all the time.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8320953/Amazing-moment-300-Amish-men-lift-huge-barn-bare-hands-field.html

Finland’s big experiment with giving a UBI to unemployed people found that the money doesn’t make them any likelier to get jobs, but it makes them feel happier. (Who would have thought free money would do that?)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-06/milestone-free-money-study-shows-happiness-grows-but-jobs-don-t

Internal U.S. State Department communiques show that diplomats were concerned about lax safety protocols at a Chinese animal disease lab in Wuhan. The lab had samples of diseases similar to COVID-19.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/

Is the COVID-19 pandemic SAVING some lives? The lockdown means less air pollution, which in turn means fewer people dying of respiratory distress. (Also, less car traffic means fewer road fatalities)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8180063/Coronavirus-lockdown-slashes-air-pollution-China-25-36-000-lives-month.html

The U.S. COVID-19 death toll has hit 100,000. Remember the White House press conference from two months ago when Trump’s advisors put forth that number, and how sobering it was? It’s strange that we’ve arrived there.
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/3/31/21202188/us-deaths-coronavirus-trump-white-house-presser-modeling-100000

In this interview from two months ago, Bill Gates predicted that that the number of active COVID-19 cases would peak in every part of the U.S. by late April. He was pretty accurate, though a handful of states didn’t peak until early May, and Arizona has still not peaked. Gates went on to predict that a month would have to pass after those peaks for states to start safely lifting their lockdowns, meaning that we’d start seeing a lot of that around late May (now). Again, he was right.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/03/27/bill-gates-coronavirus-town-hall-shutdown-april-peak-sot-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/stories-worth-watching/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/05/14/coronavirus-pandemic-covid-19-peak-dates-for-every-state/111695368/

Bill Gates now predicts:
-The world won’t return to its pre-COVID-19 state until a good vaccine has been invented and given to almost the whole human population.
-A vaccine won’t be invented until early 2021 or mid-2022.
-After that, distributing the vaccine to everyone will take months or years.
-By the end, the COVID-19 pandemic will have cost the world tens of trillions of dollars. (2019 global GDP was $85 trillion)
-The vaccine will probably become part of the standard vaccine schedule given to infants.
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/at-a-time-when-leadership-is-rare-bill-gates-stands-tall-on-covid-19/

Though we’ll endure a sucky “new normal” for the next year or two, I disagree with predictions that the pandemic will permanently alter how people interact (e.g. – no more hugging, no more going to restaurants). Such predictions run contrary to human nature.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/05/i-predict-your-predictions-are-wrong/611896/

What color is your power armor?

My recent analysis of the combat exoskeletons from Edge of Tomorrow made me realize that there are at least three types of humanoid or animal-like mechanical fighting machines frequently depicted in science fiction, and I’ve decided to explore their feasibility. I think they can be grouped into these categories:

  1. Power armor / exoskeleton
  2. Mechwarrior (“Mech”)
  3. Jaeger / Zord

Power armor / exoskeleton

Defining characteristics:

  • Can only accommodate one person.
  • Provides some combination of enhanced strength, endurance, speed, or carrying capacity.
  • Best thought of as a “suit.”
  • If worn, the person’s overall size is not so big that they can’t fit through standard-sized doorways or into vehicles designed for un-armored people.
  • The suited person remains narrow enough to fit between trees and duck under branches in wooded areas.
  • Depicted in Edge of Tomorrow, the Fallout, Starcraft, and Halo video games

Problems and disadvantages:

  • Limited power supply (can’t fit a big battery into a relatively small machine and expect it to last long)
  • Could limit mobility and agility so much that you’re better off not wearing it.
  • Potentially dangerous to the wearer and to comrades who are not wearing their own, protective suits. Risk of serious accidents rises if your strength is amplified and you have lots of heavy, unyielding metal strapped to your body.

Feasibility:

  • Mildly feasible.
  • Light exoskeleton that increases load-carrying capacity of infantrymen, or lets them carry heavier weapons than otherwise possible (like .50 caliber machine guns) could be valuable and practical someday.
  • Heavy, fully enclosed exoskeleton for short duration, close-combat missions might also be practical.
  • Best use might be in noncombat logistic roles, like picking up and moving heavy cargo around bases.
  • Discussed at length in my blog entry about Edge of Tomorrow.

Mechwarrior (“Mech”)

Defining characteristics:

  • Can accommodate one or two people.
  • Can’t fit through standard-sized doorways or into other vehicles except large cargo planes and maybe large cargo helicopters.
  • Similar size and firepower as a tank or attack helicopter.
  • Should be thought of as a military vehicle and not as a suit.
  • Primarily or exclusively designed to fight using guns, missiles, and other ranged weapons. Usually ill-suited for hand-to-hand combat.
  • In theory, can traverse rougher terrain than wheeled/tracked vehicles thanks to its legs.
  • Depicted in Return of the Jedi, the Mechwarrior and Titanfall video games
The “spider tank” from the Ghost in the Shell anime movie is a more realistic type of mech since it has more than two legs and a low center of gravity.

Problems and disadvantages:

  • Having legs instead of wheels or caterpillar tracks would be problematic.
    • Legs would propel the vehicle slower than wheels or caterpillar treads. The ride would also be much bumpier, which would be exhausting and potentially disorienting for crewmen. Combat performance would suffer if the crewmen were dizzy and beat-up by the time they arrived at the battle site.
    • Mobility advantage over wheeled and tracked vehicles is questionable since mechs would have higher ground pressure–all of their weight would be concentrated on two feet, whereas traditional armored vehicles spread out their weight over 6-8 large wheels or two, long caterpillar tracks. This means a mech would have worse problems sinking into the mud and getting stuck.
    • Having a humanoid or animal-like layout (i.e. – legs for sure, and possibly arms as well) would increase a fighting vehicle’s surface-area-to-volume-ratio compared to a traditional wheeled or tracked vehicle with the same size and firepower. A mech would thus need to devote more of its mass to armor to achieve the same, all-around ballistic protection as a tank. Increasing the armor would necessitate deleting other things to save weight (e.g. – reduce fuel, ammo, or main weapon size/power).
    • The powertrain would need to be heavier and more complicated. A conventional tank like a T-72 essentially has a big truck engine that is transversely mounted and spins a shaft connected to one wheel on either side of the vehicle. It’s a simple and compact layout. A layout designed to move two, multi-jointed legs would be much more mechanically complex, requiring multiple motors and many spinning shafts, meaning more weight and more moving parts that can fail.
  • Its width would prevent it from going down alleys or between closely-spaced trees. Human enemies could run to constricted areas like that for cover. The mech’s big selling point–that it can go places where trucks and tanks can’t–is eroded thanks to the tree problem.
  • Its tallness would impose many problems.
    • Forested areas become even more impassable since branches can block mechs and/or obscure their crewman’s view of targets at ground level. Power lines, some road lights, and bridges/overpasses also turn into obstacles. The mechs definitely can’t be used for peacekeeping or domestic policing if they’re going to be constantly snapping power lines and cutting off electricity to whole neighborhoods. High ground pressure might also damage roads by leaving footprint indentations.
    • The taller and wider a mech is, the bigger of a target it becomes, and the easier it is for enemies to shoot it from longer ranges.
    • Mech would have high centers of gravity that would introduce the risk of tip-overs. Even if falling over didn’t destroy a mech, it could do enough damage and injury to the vehicle and crewman, respectively, to knock them out of the fight.
    • The torque from shooting heavy weapons mounted high on the mechwarrior would tip it over.
  • Accidental injury problem would be worse than in power armor / exoskeletons. For example, if a mech fell over by accident, it could crush friendly 20 infantrymen.
A “walking excavator” provides the design basis for the most practical type of combat mech

Feasibility:

  • Probably infeasible. There’s a reason why there are tens of thousands of advanced tanks in global military service, but not even one, basic mech.
  • It would be better to use aircraft and infantry to patrol and fight in areas where the terrain is too rough to bring in tanks and wheeled vehicles. Probably not worth it to build mechs just for specialty engagements in those places. Mechs might provide an advantage there, but would be inferior to traditional military vehicles in all other types of terrain. Not a flexible asset.
  • Building a useful mech is a much bigger technical challenge than making powered exoskeletons.
  • If we decided to build combat mechs anyway:
    • Designing them with four or more legs would make them safer, more stable, less likely to get stuck in the mud (ground pressure problem), and would offer a smoother ride than mechs with two legs. Problematically, a human pilot wouldn’t be able to intuitively control a machine that had more than two legs. Like in a car, the pilot would probably use a steering wheel and pedals to input direction and speed commands to the mech, and the mech’s computer would figure out exactly how to reposition the 4+ legs to achieve that. However, this disconnect between inputs and fine movements of the vehicle could lead to problems if the computer stepped on, say, a land mine, friendly infantryman, or an open sewer hole that the human pilot could see and wanted to avoid.
    • Making it as low to the ground as possible, with its volume distributed horizontally as opposed to vertically, would make it more stable and reduce its target profile.
    • Spider-like or beetle-like mech makes more sense than human-like mech.
    • The number of legs would present a tradeoff between vehicle stability and smoothness of ride vs. fuel efficiency and mechanical complexity/breakdown rate. Unsure what the optimum number of legs would be, but “two legs bad” for sure.
    • Would probably need built-in wheels for easy transport over roads and flatter ground. Remember, it won’t be climbing jagged hills or stepping over big logs in the forest all the time. This would also be easier on the crewmen.
    • The most practical design might resemble a “walking excavator,” but with armor and heavy weapons comparable to what is found on APCs. Couldn’t have the same firepower, speed, or protection as a main battle tank. (Videos showing walking excavators in action: 1) https://youtu.be/Hn1aZQFhC40 2) https://youtu.be/j87k71kOBis)
    • Would have a 360 degree rotating gun turret, like almost all armored vehicles. Wouldn’t need as big of a cannon since heavily-armored tanks wouldn’t be able to get into the rugged terrain areas where mechs would operate (20mm – 40mm cannon would be fine against other mechs, infantry, structures, and entrenched positions).
    • Might make sense to have heavy-lift helicopters transport mechs to their battle/patrol zones (mountain top, forest clearing, sand dune area).
    • A fully automated mech that lacked human crewmen wouldn’t suffer from many of the problems listed in this section, like disorientation and exhaustion from a bumpy ride. Small, unmanned turret would reduce center of gravity as well.

Jaeger / Zord

Defining characteristics:

  • Huge. At least 100 ft tall. Size and firepower are comparable to warships (modern destroyer or cruiser).
  • Strong enough to win fights with big groups of armored vehicles and planes attacking it at once.
  • Best thought of as a “one-man army.”
  • Can go anywhere since its feet are so big it can just step on and crush trees and walk up hills like they were steps. Can also wade through shallow bodies of water.
  • Has standoff weapons like missiles and cannons but is also designed for hand-to-hand combat and striking with oversize, handheld weapons like giant swords.
  • Depicted in Pacific Rim, several Godzilla movies, the Power Rangers TV show and movies.

Problems and disadvantages:

  • The “square-cube law,” along with limitations on the strength-to-weight ratios of physical materials, effectively prohibits the construction of machines this big that can also rapidly walk around and violently swing their arms (it also prohibits the existence of animals in the same size range).
  • Massive investment of money and resources into a single weapon that can only be in one place, at one time would probably be better spent on many smaller weapons (e.g. – tanks, fighter planes, mobile missile launchers) that can be spread out to patrol and fight enemies across large areas, and concentrated in one place when necessary to fight against a strong enemy.
  • Falls and tip-overs would be fatal to human pilots. Accidentally falling onto buildings or groups of friendly troops could kill hundreds of people at once.
  • Shares many of the same problems mech have, but to a worse degree.
  • They would be gigantic targets that enemies could see and shoot at from dozens of miles away, or bomb from high altitudes. They wouldn’t be able to hide themselves except in cities among skyscrapers, in canyons, or perhaps by diving into deep bodies of water. In every other environment, they would be impossible to camouflage.
  • Explored in my End of Evangelion review.

Feasibility:

  • Infeasible for many scientific and engineering reasons.
  • We would need Star Trek levels of technology (radically stronger and lighter materials, miniaturized fusion reactors, and cheap ways to build both) to make the sorts of Jaegers and Zords shown in the movies. With current technology we might be able to build Jaegers and Zords that were extremely slow, fragile, expensive, and of almost no military value. They would be missile- and gun platforms only, and would break themselves if they punched or kicked anything hard.
  • Even if the Star Trek technology existed, it’s doubtful anyone would make a Jaeger/Zord since it’s better to create a land force made up of many small, expendable units than to invest everything in one giant, all-important fighting machine. A single point of failure is really bad. A force made of many units is also more flexible since they can be spread out across a large area.

Additional thoughts on power armor / exoskeletons

  • The most realistic of the three types of fighting machines.
  • A minimalist exoskeleton with attachment points for big weapons like .50 cal machine guns, grenade launchers, and recoilless missile launchers would let infantry squads bring heavier weapons on patrols into rugged terrain areas. Squad members wearing the exoskeletons could fill some of the firepower niche that mechs are intended to fill.
  • Instead of all the troops wearing those exoskeletons with big weapons, it might be worn by every fifth or tenth man, specially trained for that equipment. Most of the troops would have normal weapons and would have no exoskeletons or lighter exoskeletons just designed to increase their load carrying capacity and to ease the physical strain of long marches.
  • Might work like this: Squad leader keeps the .50 cal exo-soldier in the back of the line unless needed. If so, he calls him up and deploys him carefully.
  • My thinking is guided by assumptions about existing science and tech. Exoskeletons would be totally plausible with Star Trek technology (e.g. – super light, super strong metal; flexible bulletproof body panels, personal fusion reactors).
  • Avatar final battle would actually be ideal scenario to use heavy weapon exo-soldiers. Forest environment blocked air support and wheeled vehicles (the tree cover would have also made it impractical to deploy mechs). Idea was to use helicopters to insert troops, win, and then recover them after a few hours, so no risk of batteries dying. Enemies were large, so abnormally large weapons needed.
  • Unclear if Edge of Tomorrow beach landing was well-suited to exo-soldiers. Mimics were very fast, but not actually that robust. Regular troops with normal weapons would have been better since they were faster and more agile. Also could have landed greater number of regular troops with same number of transport craft.